مـسـلمـه//𝑴𝒖𝒔𝒍𝒊𝒎𝒂🌸🖤
Region: IQ
Saturday 07 November 2026 19:08:49 GMT
1603
239
4
26
Music
Download
Comments
🎱𝑳𝒐𝒍𝒂 :
الحمدلله
2026-11-07 22:18:49
0
بنت الاكابر 🦋🤍 :
اللهم آمين يارب العالمين
2026-11-07 22:40:09
0
ibrahimaldalime :
آمين يارب عالمين
2026-11-07 21:54:25
0
أفياء 🤫 :
يارب يارب يارب
2026-11-07 22:31:18
0
نوارافيصل :
🥰🥰🥰
2026-11-07 20:31:17
0
🩶طال الانتضار 🩶 :
🥰🥰🥰
2026-11-07 21:57:25
0
To see more videos from user @a___sli20, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
![A common thing I see is people not knowing the difference between “sexualising” and “objectifying”. And not understanding the importance of consent in either context. There’s a lot here. Let’s begin with this: The Madonna Wh0re Complex [Freudian]. Where a woman is seen either as a person, deserving of social and recognition respect, earned precisely through her purity and the absence of her sexuality & promiscuity. OR she is seen as a sex object. Any presence of sexuality or promiscuity in her character forfeits her right to be seen as a person, to receive recognition or social respect, and reduces her to a sexual object for the benefit exclusively of others. Men are not subjected to this dichotomy. They’re afforded the luxury of sexuality as part of their whole personhood, not antithetical to their capacity to be respected in any way. This is the underpinning for this conflation between “sexualisation” and “objectification”, especially in regards to women. If to be sexual is to become nothing more than that sexuality, then to sexualise is to objectify. An expectation exclusively pushed onto women. But the reality is that just as is the case for men, women’s sexuality is part of our personhood; not a direct juxtaposition of it. Now onto consent. To sexualise somebody without consent, and act upon that, can be objectifying, because it assumes their role to be one of sexual gratification to others against their will. It disregards consent, or the absence thereof, and reduces them to the object of another’s desires. But to sexualise somebody is not inherently objectifying by any means. To find somebody attractive in a sexual way is not objectifying. It is simply attraction, and can and should coexist alongside the regognition of their whole personhood and the need for their consent to act upon said attraction. For somebody to openly express their sexuality is not objectifying because it does not strip them of their personhood. It merely expresses a small part of that personhood. Even if that is all that they choose to express (say on an online platform), they still cannot be objectifying themselves. Because again, the expression of sexuality does not remove a persons’ personhood. And the observer, even seeing only that part of the person, should understand that a whole person exists alongside that sexuality. Man, women, or otherwise. (Side note: this difference in how men vs women are treated, a difference that upholds systems of oppression of women, is part of why trans and gender-non-conforming people are a threat to the patriarchy and so the enemy of patriarchs. That is why there is such hatred for them. Not because they’re a threat to women, because they’re a threat to the oppression of women and the relative power of men). Objectification can be role played. And in that context, one can consent to “being objectified”, but it must be done in the context of a relationship in which their whole personhood and consent are recognised, respected, and adhered to. And so no real objectification is taking place - only the script and roleplay of it. Real objectification lies in the eye of the beholder, as it were. And requires the absence of recognition respect. That is, that it requires them to see a person as less than a person; as an object. We live in constant awareness of ourselves. Of our own lived experiences, traits, strengths, weaknesses, fears, joys, etc. As a result one cannot objectify themselves, not for any significant amount of time. Internised misogyny makes it a possibility momentarily, where a woman may only see herself through the lens of sexual appeal to men in a given moment [when getting ready is a common one], but everybody is aware of things that make us human. But others can choose to ignore those parts of us and objectify us permanently in their mind. And for women, many people often do this to us. Men and women. Everybody is socialised under the same patriarchal ideas. [MORE IN COMMENTS ➡️]](/video/cover/7686619464896417046.webp)
