@mothershipsg: The Court of Appeal has published its full written reasons on Nov. 5 for acquitting former Wah!Banana actor Lev Panfilov of rape and sexual assault charges. The court identified several inconsistencies in the complainant's evidence, including her accounts of screaming during the alleged assault and questions surrounding blood-stained underwear presented as physical evidence. While stressing that victims of sexual crimes cannot "straitjacketed" in how they are expected to react, the court found that the inconsistencies, taken together, raised reasonable doubt in the prosecution's case. #mothershipcourt #singapore #court #fyp

user2848388446437 :

So what's the penalty for giving a wrong judgment? The judge should serve the sentence he gave? [Snicker]

Tristan Mayhem™ :

So the question is can he counter sue her. I would gladly raise money for him.

Z_M_D :

Singapore justice system. no truth just lies and who hold the most power

GforGebra :

now the thing is who is the prosecutor and the IO of this case? why wasnt the investigation carried out more thoroughly?? secondly, who is the judge that found the evidence provided by the lady unusually convincing? When a judge gave a wrong judgement, what are the consequences??

annoyingrooster :

dude got caned for nothing. geezus.

TEERAK ❤️ :

D꙲꙲Z꙲꙲E꙲꙲R꙲꙲600-Edits :

First again

Doctor C :

My question 🙋‍♂️as lev mention in his podcast likewise … the reason why he won the appeal was because he had sufficient fundings of $500k, how about those that can’t get even close to $50k , just remain inside the cell for 11 years ..??

calculus_maths :

So now what about the woman ??

dragonitee :

ok what now

Radar :

Another toxic case in Sg men,please wake up!

马得发哥 :

I usually call con when someone is "unusually convincing"

Foodsage :

Publish your name then we will know her consistency of whether she’s telling the truth shouldn’t we?

Bobby :

In true typical Singapore fashion. Those in power are not held accountable for incompetencey. The judge whos ruling was overturned sleeps peacefully after ruining a man's life.

EFG :

Next time for consensual sex, man should take video of it as consensual before proceeding. The woman can easily cause the man to lose everything just by falsely accusing and meeting such an initial judge. The proof of guilt will just be frivolous and nothing more than her words against you. Then after the whole saga, the woman is still not known and can hide under anonymity. Such is the unfairness and place of burden against male. And you have society judging even before guilty with feminist organization like AWARE pouncing on you and bear no responsibility thereafter.

method71b :

Gender discrimination is a feature, not a bug