Language
English
عربي
Tiếng Việt
русский
français
español
日本語
한글
Deutsch
हिन्दी
简体中文
繁體中文
API
Home
How To Use
Language
English
عربي
Tiếng Việt
русский
français
español
日本語
한글
Deutsch
हिन्दी
简体中文
繁體中文
Home
Detail
@ximpao8l:
nazanin
Open In TikTok:
Region: US
Monday 09 November 2026 10:05:02 GMT
1
1
0
0
Music
Download
No Watermark .mp4 (
1.48MB
)
Watermark .mp4 (
1.53MB
)
Music .mp3
Comments
There are no more comments for this video.
To see more videos from user @ximpao8l, please go to the Tikwm homepage.
Other Videos
váy mặc tiệc đc khen quá trời #vayxinh #xuhuong #thoitrangnu #quangcao
اللهم أجعل #الدنيا في ايدينا وليس في قلوبنا
Mama met her match😂 #storytime #drama #viral
#xhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh #truckersofeurope3 #LIVEIncentiveProgram #MyLIVEJourney #PaidPartnership
@netaobombeef E Se Fosse VC😱🤯😱 #netaobombeef #netaoclipfy #clipfyleague #churrasco #fy
Lammens' Contact on Suzuki Should Have Cost United 🧤 [Manchester United’s 4-4 draw with Aston Villa ended with Patrick Dorgu heading home Bruno Fernandes’ late corner, but the key issue for me is the contact between Senne Lammens and Aston Villa goalkeeper Zion Suzuki. I believe Lammens interfered with Suzuki and that the equaliser should have been ruled out. The supplied still appears to show Lammens looking towards Suzuki rather than tracking the ball, while moving into the goalkeeper’s space. The fan-shot video captures the closing set-piece from a distance, so it cannot settle every detail of the contact or Suzuki’s movement. That limitation matters, but it does not remove the concern raised by the still. The Premier League’s 2026/27 refereeing guidance says an attacking player should be penalised when he makes a clear action without trying to play the ball, makes contact, and affects a goalkeeper’s ability to play or challenge for it. That is the test I believe should have been applied. VAR allowed Dorgu’s equaliser to stand. I explain why I disagree, what IFAB Law 12 says about impeding an opponent with contact, and why this goalmouth challenge deserved closer scrutiny. I do not claim there is proof of a conspiracy to protect Manchester United.] Manchester United, Aston Villa, Manchester United vs Aston Villa, Man Utd 4-4 Aston Villa, Premier League, Premier League 2026/27, Patrick Dorgu, Senne Lammens, Zion Suzuki, Lammens foul on Suzuki, goalkeeper interference, goalkeeper obstruction, goalkeeper foul, Dorgu equaliser, Bruno Fernandes corner, VAR decision, VAR controversy, Law 12 football, impeding goalkeeper, Old Trafford #ManchesterUnited #AstonVilla #PremierLeague #PatrickDorgu Why Dorgu's Last-Gasp Equaliser Should Not Have Stood Did Lammens Interfere With Aston Villa's Suzuki The Goalkeeper Contact VAR Needed To Examine Premier League's New Goalkeeper Guidance Makes This Call Crucial Was Suzuki Prevented From Reaching Fernandes' Corner Manchester United's 4-4 Equaliser Leaves A Big VAR Question Law 12 Explains Why Goalkeeper Interference Matters Patrick Dorgu Scores, But Was The Goal Legal How Lammens' Movement Changed Suzuki's Chance The Goalmouth Contact That Decided United's Comeback#creatorsearchinsights
About
Robot
API
Legal
Privacy Policy