@terrytess46:

Terry Tess

Open In TikTok:

Region: KE

Monday 09 November 2026 13:57:27 GMT

20146

511

18

267

Music

Download

No Watermark .mp4 (16.7MB) Watermark .mp4 (16.7MB) Music .mp3

Comments

Angela :

the real songs enzi zile.

2026-11-10 18:11:39

2

johnsonol :

Amen.... Music you can believe in

2026-11-10 11:55:51

1

Alice Muhoho :

Unanifurahisha sana kutuletea hizi nyimbo.keep up good job

2026-11-09 22:25:01

1

Pastor Daniel Kasina :

Nice song

2026-11-10 04:08:52

1

mvuli_lenz :

thanks

2026-11-09 16:19:33

1

The ChairMan :

Wimbo niupendao🥰

2026-11-10 18:06:18

0

Raphael :

✝️✝️✝️✝️✝️✝️amina[Pray][Pray][Pray][Pray][Pray][Pray][Pray][Pray][Pray][Pray]umenibariki nawe pia[Pray]ubarikiwe[Pray][Pray][Pray]

2026-11-09 18:04:36

1

patuh Juliana :

akh huu wimbo nitau type kesho

2026-11-09 19:23:13

1

mama taifa :

🙏🙏

2026-11-09 21:40:06

1

mkalumalucas :

🥰🥰🥰

2026-11-10 05:54:02

1

To see more videos from user @terrytess46, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

#viralvideo #fyp #hay zendagay#💔😭😭💔

#viralvideo #fyp #hay zendagay#💔😭😭💔

What amazing games these are #Halo #haloedit #gaming #xbox360 #edit

What amazing games these are #Halo #haloedit #gaming #xbox360 #edit

So me #butters #southpark #southparkfandom #foryoupagе #fyp

So me #butters #southpark #southparkfandom #foryoupagе #fyp

Lost..!

The interview room in Tripoli on March 23, 1976, was a study in controlled defiance as Muammar Gaddafi sat before British journalist Gerald Seymour, just three months after the OPEC hostage crisis had shocked the world. The Libyan leader, dressed in his characteristic military uniform, faced questions that cut to the heart of Western accusations against him: had he known about the Vienna raid in advance, and had he offered safe haven to the terrorist known as Carlos the Jackal? Gaddafi's responses were swift and categorical. He had not been informed about the attack, he stated flatly, denying any prior knowledge of the operation that had seen oil ministers taken hostage and a Austrian city thrown into chaos. On Carlos, he was equally direct: he had not allowed the Venezuelan-born militant to come to Libya, rejecting the accusation that he had provided a sanctuary for the world's most wanted man. Yet the interview was more than a simple denial of wrongdoing. Gaddafi used the platform to articulate a distinction that would define his foreign policy for decades: the difference between terrorism and the legitimate struggle for freedom. He condemned terrorism unequivocally, but he argued passionately that armed resistance against colonialism, occupation, and apartheid could not be branded as such. This was not mere semantics; it was the ideological foundation of Libya's role as a patron of liberation movements across Africa and the Arab world. By 1976, Gaddafi was actively funding and arming groups fighting white minority rule, the MPLA in Angola, SWAPO in Namibia, the ANC and PAC in South Africa, and his support was concrete, from cash to weapons to training camps. In his eyes, these were not terrorists but freedom fighters, and Libya was their rear base. The context of the interview was crucial. Gaddafi saw himself as the heir to Nasser's pan-Arabism, a champion of the Palestinian cause, and a vanguard of the anti-imperialist struggle. Libya was a major financial backer of Palestinian resistance factions, contributing millions quarterly, and Gaddafi's diplomatic weight had helped persuade dozens of African nations to sever ties with Israel. In the Arab and African world, he was not the

The interview room in Tripoli on March 23, 1976, was a study in controlled defiance as Muammar Gaddafi sat before British journalist Gerald Seymour, just three months after the OPEC hostage crisis had shocked the world. The Libyan leader, dressed in his characteristic military uniform, faced questions that cut to the heart of Western accusations against him: had he known about the Vienna raid in advance, and had he offered safe haven to the terrorist known as Carlos the Jackal? Gaddafi's responses were swift and categorical. He had not been informed about the attack, he stated flatly, denying any prior knowledge of the operation that had seen oil ministers taken hostage and a Austrian city thrown into chaos. On Carlos, he was equally direct: he had not allowed the Venezuelan-born militant to come to Libya, rejecting the accusation that he had provided a sanctuary for the world's most wanted man. Yet the interview was more than a simple denial of wrongdoing. Gaddafi used the platform to articulate a distinction that would define his foreign policy for decades: the difference between terrorism and the legitimate struggle for freedom. He condemned terrorism unequivocally, but he argued passionately that armed resistance against colonialism, occupation, and apartheid could not be branded as such. This was not mere semantics; it was the ideological foundation of Libya's role as a patron of liberation movements across Africa and the Arab world. By 1976, Gaddafi was actively funding and arming groups fighting white minority rule, the MPLA in Angola, SWAPO in Namibia, the ANC and PAC in South Africa, and his support was concrete, from cash to weapons to training camps. In his eyes, these were not terrorists but freedom fighters, and Libya was their rear base. The context of the interview was crucial. Gaddafi saw himself as the heir to Nasser's pan-Arabism, a champion of the Palestinian cause, and a vanguard of the anti-imperialist struggle. Libya was a major financial backer of Palestinian resistance factions, contributing millions quarterly, and Gaddafi's diplomatic weight had helped persuade dozens of African nations to sever ties with Israel. In the Arab and African world, he was not the "notorious" figure portrayed in Western headlines but a celebrated ally, a leader who had put his oil wealth behind the fight against colonialism. The Seymour interview was therefore a delicate balancing act: Gaddafi needed to maintain his public persona as a leader who opposed terrorism while simultaneously continuing his covert support for revolutionary movements that the West labeled as terrorist. The interview captured a defining contradiction that would haunt Gaddafi's legacy. He publicly denied any link to Carlos and the OPEC raid, yet the operation's getaway plane had flown to Tripoli, and the Saudi oil minister held hostage later stated that Carlos claimed he had received his instructions in Libya. Decades later, Carlos himself would state from his French prison cell that Gaddafi, not Saddam Hussein, had ordered the attack. For Gaddafi, the denial in the Seymour interview was a necessary piece of diplomatic theater. It allowed him to maintain the public persona of a leader who supported only "legal" struggles for freedom, even as he was accused of using proxies like Carlos to strike at the heart of the global oil establishment. The interview was a snapshot of a leader skillfully navigating the line between his public anti-terrorism stance and his covert, often controversial, methods of waging revolutionary struggle on the world stage. #libya🇱🇾 #Libya #Gaddafi #OPEC #Vienna

how to recovery suspended facebook account 2026 #facebookrecovery #facebooksuspended #Facebook #shanmutu #foryou

how to recovery suspended facebook account 2026 #facebookrecovery #facebooksuspended #Facebook #shanmutu #foryou

About

Robot
API

Legal

Privacy Policy