The one scientific question that can’t be answered, but everybody wants to know. Where do the men get the audacity?!
2026-11-10 20:00:59
981
Jadeleaheaton :
I love when you read these men for absolute filth 😅
2026-11-10 18:27:43
1129
StaceyLeanne Gavard🇨🇦 :
Sir…she’s an actual csi…
2026-11-10 18:29:18
2168
Joana :
i’m actually still thinking about the person who commented “this isn’t a dna case” 💀
2026-11-10 19:40:45
511
lorelaineff :
That’s a big word for Elmo 😂
2026-11-10 18:11:10
198
Justabystander🇨🇦 :
Have they done genetic genealogy or is there not not a sample for that.
2026-11-14 05:01:47
0
kennedymereness :
you are so educated and self confident!! love your energy and knowledge 💖
2026-11-10 18:05:55
193
KTcrimlaw :
Do ghosts leave DNA behind when they touch an object??
2026-11-10 21:45:43
366
janaknight7 :
Why have they not tried to upload it into the genealogy databases or have they?
2026-11-13 22:17:03
0
kelley :
I love how you read 'em to filth.
"thats a big word for Elmo" is one of my fave ways to piss off a man.
2026-11-10 18:36:35
148
DogMa :
But but but but….unverified ghosts said otherwise
2026-11-10 18:06:35
737
Rocky Mountain Minted 🇨🇦 :
Wait! Lemme get comfy
2026-11-10 23:48:28
35
Jane :
C’mon y’all gotta protect the man ego
2026-11-13 19:06:06
0
‧͙⁺˚*・༓☾🌛🐺 enid🐺 🌜☽༓・*˚⁺‧͙ :
you have a PHD and 20 years of experience and he's still trying to mansplain it to you😭😭😭😭
2026-11-13 07:32:36
25
Lex 🏴 :
that’s a big word for elmo 😭😭 god you are so funny 😭
2026-11-10 18:48:21
142
chei ★ :
You are amazing!
2026-11-13 08:52:56
0
unwraplife81 :
“That’s a big word for Elmo” is sending me 😂
2026-11-10 20:27:08
19
Tom :
Science is awesome.
2026-11-10 18:23:48
36
Elle :
I prefer your breakdowns because it helps me understand 👀
2026-11-10 20:55:00
22
Okiemillennial :
“That’s a big word for Elmo” I spat out my water 🤣😂🤣😂
2026-11-10 23:39:15
15
Tae | MUA & Esthetician :
Paranormal??????? Like ghosts???? I’m so tired in 2026 😭
2026-11-11 00:52:16
13
peanutbutterandjenny :
if you had explained this way first, most people would be lost. because it's not our expertise and that's okay. but being able to take data, information, scientific terminology and processes etc. and explain it in laymen's terms is a sign of deep understanding. you give us the information in language we can absorb. it doesn't mean it's wrong, it means you thoroughly understand what you're talking and able to convey that information. this guy just wanted to be like "I know big words!"
2026-11-10 21:57:55
16
DeeAnn❌️ 🇨🇦 :
Amy, do you know whether they are attempting genetic genealogy? This case was so prevalent in my youth and I would really like to see it solved sooner rather than later.
2026-11-10 18:25:00
17
xyz123absolutelynot :
Amy come on, how can you not listen to the guy who investigates spooky noises [Tears of joy][Tears of joy]
2026-11-10 18:55:11
17
beipiofan :
so… he wasn’t really wrong though. he didn’t say that the samples couldn’t be compared to others or entered into CODIS, etc., he just said it’s more nuanced than it being one clear, complete profile from 1 man. there’s been multiple different scientists who have analyzed these samples and the consensus is quite mixed on how many different individuals could be making up the composites. obviously everyone agrees it’s at least 2, because JonBenet is the main contributor in all of the samples, but some of them have said it could be up to six or seven different individuals.
2026-11-10 19:52:05
7
To see more videos from user @amy_santoro, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.