@kporter.stuff: Why FEA Results Don't Always Match Physical Test Failures FEA predicted a comfortable margin, and the physical part failed well below that load, because a boundary condition assumption was wrong right where it mattered most. Here's why simulation results still need physical correlation on critical load paths. 🙌🏼⚙️ #MechanicalEngineering #FEA #ProductDesign #StructuralDesign #DFM

kporter | engineer
kporter | engineer
Open In TikTok:
Region: US
Wednesday 11 November 2026 20:18:10 GMT
2527
99
7
1

Music

Download

Comments

mikefrey32
MikeF :
Where is the gate and what was the failure? After a lifetime spent in injection molding, I could probably just look at the design and intended end use and figure it out in my head.
2026-11-11 21:52:54
2
whothefuckisethan
whothefuckisethan :
Injection molded? Could be an issue with the resin or mold or cooling time
2026-11-12 00:42:55
1
jooles876
Jooles :
A simulation never beats a physical prototype, especially on such a simple part.
2026-11-11 20:41:16
2
lestat.de.lioncou
lestat de lioncourt :
What is all the complicated language??? There was a weak spot. That’s what ur trying to say
2026-11-12 00:08:11
1
keshunjore
keshunjore :
❤️❤️❤️
2026-11-12 05:34:34
1
To see more videos from user @kporter.stuff, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos


About