@chutecraque: Clubes Brasileiros com mais rebaixamentos na história dos pontos corridos #tiktokesportes

ChuteCraque
ChuteCraque
Open In TikTok:
Region: BR
Thursday 12 November 2026 15:51:43 GMT
1125
46
3
1

Music

Download

Comments

joaomiguel11015
ney✋️😝✋️🇧🇷🇧🇷 :
palmeiras tem 2 rebaixamento
2026-11-12 16:27:35
0
henry_js14
[h e n r y ] 1 4 :
😁😁😁
2026-11-12 17:33:08
0
To see more videos from user @chutecraque, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

THEIR HEARTS WERE STILL BEATING—WHAT “HEMORRHAGIC” REALLY MEANS SHARE THIS PLEASE!  Some people insist that Maddie and Kaylee were already deceased when the paired wounds to their anterior necks were inflicted. However, that conclusion is difficult to reconcile with the language used in their autopsy reports. Kaylee had two gaping, curvilinear incised wounds across the anterior neck. Her report states that the wound tracks were hemorrhagic and involved the skin, subcutaneous tissue and superficial neck musculature. Maddie had two parallel, linear incised wounds across the anterior neck. Her report describes those wound tracks as minimally hemorrhagic through the skin, subcutaneous tissue and superficial neck musculature. That difference matters—but “minimally hemorrhagic” does not mean “non-hemorrhagic.” It means that bleeding into the affected tissue was present, although in a smaller or more limited amount. For tissue along a fresh wound track to become hemorrhagic, blood must escape from damaged vessels into the surrounding tissue while circulation or vascular pressure is still present. In ordinary forensic terms, that supports the heart still beating—or effective circulation not having completely ceased—when the injury was inflicted. The smaller amount of hemorrhage documented in Maddie’s wounds could potentially reflect several factors, including: * Substantially reduced blood pressure * Significant blood loss from earlier injuries * The size and type of vessels encountered * Differences in wound mechanics * An injury occurring closer to circulatory arrest The wording is not an exact stopwatch. By itself, it cannot establish the precise sequence of every injury or the exact second circulation stopped. Those conclusions require the complete autopsy findings and interpretation by the forensic pathologist. But the autopsy language does matter. Anyone claiming that these wounds were definitely inflicted after death must explain why the wound tracks were documented as hemorrhagic and minimally hemorrhagic. The reports describe bleeding within the injured tissue—not a complete absence of bleeding. That does not answer every question about timing or sequence. It does mean that “they were already dead” should not be presented as an established forensic fact without additional pathological evidence. The evidence deserves more than assumptions. It deserves accuracy. #IdahoFour #MaddieMogen #KayleeGoncalves #AutopsyEvidence #ForensicPathology
THEIR HEARTS WERE STILL BEATING—WHAT “HEMORRHAGIC” REALLY MEANS SHARE THIS PLEASE! Some people insist that Maddie and Kaylee were already deceased when the paired wounds to their anterior necks were inflicted. However, that conclusion is difficult to reconcile with the language used in their autopsy reports. Kaylee had two gaping, curvilinear incised wounds across the anterior neck. Her report states that the wound tracks were hemorrhagic and involved the skin, subcutaneous tissue and superficial neck musculature. Maddie had two parallel, linear incised wounds across the anterior neck. Her report describes those wound tracks as minimally hemorrhagic through the skin, subcutaneous tissue and superficial neck musculature. That difference matters—but “minimally hemorrhagic” does not mean “non-hemorrhagic.” It means that bleeding into the affected tissue was present, although in a smaller or more limited amount. For tissue along a fresh wound track to become hemorrhagic, blood must escape from damaged vessels into the surrounding tissue while circulation or vascular pressure is still present. In ordinary forensic terms, that supports the heart still beating—or effective circulation not having completely ceased—when the injury was inflicted. The smaller amount of hemorrhage documented in Maddie’s wounds could potentially reflect several factors, including: * Substantially reduced blood pressure * Significant blood loss from earlier injuries * The size and type of vessels encountered * Differences in wound mechanics * An injury occurring closer to circulatory arrest The wording is not an exact stopwatch. By itself, it cannot establish the precise sequence of every injury or the exact second circulation stopped. Those conclusions require the complete autopsy findings and interpretation by the forensic pathologist. But the autopsy language does matter. Anyone claiming that these wounds were definitely inflicted after death must explain why the wound tracks were documented as hemorrhagic and minimally hemorrhagic. The reports describe bleeding within the injured tissue—not a complete absence of bleeding. That does not answer every question about timing or sequence. It does mean that “they were already dead” should not be presented as an established forensic fact without additional pathological evidence. The evidence deserves more than assumptions. It deserves accuracy. #IdahoFour #MaddieMogen #KayleeGoncalves #AutopsyEvidence #ForensicPathology

About