@boreinaw: that law was ignored in certain cases but when it comes to rhaenyra and aegon suddenly everyone cares about the law #asoiaf #rhaenyratargaryen #teamblack #houseofthedragon #fyp
It’s also a tradition not a law and the king (Viserys) has the authority to change it, yet people still say otherwise somehow
2026-11-12 17:37:44
36
𝘝𝘢𝘭𝘢𝘳𝘳 :
How can anyone not consider Rhaenyra the heir in 2026? It’s as if the people in the series are stuck in a different century but you knowing full well how misogynistic that is why would you think that way?
2026-11-12 17:00:12
16
Satin 🔥🐉 :
lol the targs also just had an absolute rule meaning that viserys was above the law, so even if there was an inheritance law, viserys could've changed it.
2026-11-12 18:38:32
2
Tataram.200 :
"rhaenyra was a woman so she cant-" tell my you're misogynic w/o telling me you're misogynic
2026-11-12 17:02:27
17
daenysreborn ⟢☾ :
Literally Aegon himself said that she was the heir. Aegon, her number one opponent said it but his fans can’t accept it
2026-11-12 17:33:22
22
420note :
You also left out this part. The first paragraph is the part George made clear wasn't vague or contradictory. The vague and contradictory part is the second paragraph, because it says both a daughter and an uncle have claims. This kinda supports Jaehaerys's choice of Baelon, since he wasn't breaking any rule when he named Baelon heir over Rhaenys. Targaryen succession was still unclear on whether a daughter or an uncle should inherit.
2026-11-12 18:10:40
1
kyle :
no they codified law, jaehaerys literally created a book of law on those things
2026-11-12 20:46:16
0
fuck TG :
Even GRRM doesn't want to give an answer, since even in medieval times they didn't know how their laws worked and only used them when they were useful.
2026-11-12 17:03:03
5
To see more videos from user @boreinaw, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.