@znaesh_chto0: #радиация #уран #распад

тг: Знаешь, что?
тг: Знаешь, что?
Open In TikTok:
Region: BY
Tuesday 02 January 2024 22:09:23 GMT
349631
5520
127
284

Music

Download

Comments

s.i.a.com
s.i.a.com :
и так миллиарды лет представьте только
2024-01-04 16:33:28
46
tengoalex
Alex Nova7276 :
Самый главный вопрос: откуда берет энергию?
2024-01-03 17:24:08
38
tsuyoshi3380
つよし :
磁石を置くと曲がりますか?
2024-02-05 06:12:26
0
infinitymultiverses
Multiverses :
И на какое расстояние вылетают эти алфа-частицы?
2024-01-05 22:26:29
2
serhii19726
dyfl9b4gy986 :
Атом урана живет 6млрд лет. Тоесть тот уран что на земле, уже не 100%?Так сколько % альфа частиц осталось в земном уране? 🤔
2024-01-05 04:49:09
1
homonovis21
homonovis21 :
этой вселенной 76трлн лет.и вы тоже участвовали в ее создании.
2024-01-07 23:27:06
0
alick_southkz
Alick South_Kz. :
Кросивое.
2024-01-13 02:05:30
0
hdgdevevsg
dhdhdhdh :
А как уран дожил до наших дней, если он всего через 6млрд лет распадается
2024-01-03 10:15:30
10
tobol_eli
tobol_eli :
ну сделайте батарейки
2024-02-19 09:23:06
0
user4746003211886
user4746003211886 :
надо создать жизнь из урана она будет долго жить
2024-02-18 09:47:43
0
bum.bum543
Bum bum :
Прикинуть даже немогу шо солнце происходит😂😂😂
2024-01-02 23:50:51
1
bogdan.shebek
bogdan.shebek :
Почему гелий 4? Там 3 нейтрона и 1 протон?
2024-01-05 18:12:26
4
sssphantomsss
Валерий :
Это разве не вечный двигатель?
2024-02-20 08:19:15
0
rodjer41
Игорь :
осталось ему излучать 1500 лет.Процес отпада уже.
2024-02-09 04:14:59
0
oldsfhing
olds :
может это и есть первая жизнь😏
2024-01-05 11:24:20
0
jvdtjgiohrwrg
Vitaliy :
Радиация это окисление пространства, то есть невидимое горение.
2024-02-26 04:04:50
0
user220022759901
user220022759901 :
[surprised] Вот это да!
2024-01-03 09:02:29
0
vikand79
Vikand :
ну судя по видео это безопасно.стоит снимает как он излучает радиацию,и он там может много и долгие годы фонить
2024-01-04 16:03:36
0
cedar083
Ramzil :
он буквально горит, невидимое плямя
2024-03-14 14:14:44
0
_nostalgia_13
Igor Nostalgia :
стрнляет
2024-01-04 13:34:31
0
irtysh_horse
Tyshastable :
А нельзя ли искусственно ускорить этот распад?
2024-03-11 15:24:01
0
user9906132240198
ПояснительнаяБригада :
Ну наконец то! Все! Теперь все понятно! А то раньше, некорректно говорили!
2024-01-04 05:51:55
4
_tryten_6_regeon
_tryten_6_regeon :
@gektor10 6 миллиардов лет он распадается!!! А ты мне говоришь что там уже картошку можно копать!!!
2024-08-10 06:52:02
0
errare_humanum_est_7
Errare_humanum_est :
❤️❤️❤️
2024-03-13 09:15:47
0
elledikhan
Да ладно) :
🥺
2024-01-03 13:06:20
0
To see more videos from user @znaesh_chto0, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

😳 THE COMMONWEALTH IS NOW GOING AFTER THE DEFENSE EXPERT HIMSELF — AND HIS RESPONSE MADE ME LAUGH. This is Dr. Paul Zeizel, the defense psychologist who has testified that, in his professional opinion, Lindsay Clancy was suffering from bipolar disorder with postpartum psychosis and was not able to appreciate the wrongfulness of her actions or conform her behavior to the law. So naturally, his credibility matters A LOT. And during cross-examination, the Commonwealth started digging into HIM. “You’ve known Attorney Reddington for a number of years, correct?” “You’ve done quite a bit of work with him over the years?” Then she moved into his credentials. He has a doctorate in clinical psychology. He has extensive military experience. But: “You are not a prescriber of medications here in the Commonwealth, are you?” And his response: “I was asked about that…” 😂 Sir knew EXACTLY where we were going. Now, underneath the facial expressions and the back-and-forth, there is an important legal strategy happening here. The Commonwealth is trying to give this jury reasons to question how much weight they should give Dr. Zeizel’s opinions. If he has worked repeatedly with Reddington, does that suggest partiality? If he is a psychologist rather than a psychiatrist who prescribes medication, should the jury give less weight to opinions involving Lindsay’s medications? Those are legitimate areas for cross-examination. But they do NOT automatically invalidate his testimony. And Zeizel certainly did not appear interested in letting the prosecutor turn those questions into something bigger than they were. That little “I was asked about that…” told me he knew this ground had already been covered. This is where expert testimony gets really interesting. The defense puts forward an expert opinion. The Commonwealth doesn’t just attack the opinion. They attack the foundation underneath the person giving it. Then the jury decides what — and WHO — they believe. Watch this exchange and tell me if you read his response the same way I did. 😂 #LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #PaulZeizel #Courtroom #TrialCoverage
😳 THE COMMONWEALTH IS NOW GOING AFTER THE DEFENSE EXPERT HIMSELF — AND HIS RESPONSE MADE ME LAUGH. This is Dr. Paul Zeizel, the defense psychologist who has testified that, in his professional opinion, Lindsay Clancy was suffering from bipolar disorder with postpartum psychosis and was not able to appreciate the wrongfulness of her actions or conform her behavior to the law. So naturally, his credibility matters A LOT. And during cross-examination, the Commonwealth started digging into HIM. “You’ve known Attorney Reddington for a number of years, correct?” “You’ve done quite a bit of work with him over the years?” Then she moved into his credentials. He has a doctorate in clinical psychology. He has extensive military experience. But: “You are not a prescriber of medications here in the Commonwealth, are you?” And his response: “I was asked about that…” 😂 Sir knew EXACTLY where we were going. Now, underneath the facial expressions and the back-and-forth, there is an important legal strategy happening here. The Commonwealth is trying to give this jury reasons to question how much weight they should give Dr. Zeizel’s opinions. If he has worked repeatedly with Reddington, does that suggest partiality? If he is a psychologist rather than a psychiatrist who prescribes medication, should the jury give less weight to opinions involving Lindsay’s medications? Those are legitimate areas for cross-examination. But they do NOT automatically invalidate his testimony. And Zeizel certainly did not appear interested in letting the prosecutor turn those questions into something bigger than they were. That little “I was asked about that…” told me he knew this ground had already been covered. This is where expert testimony gets really interesting. The defense puts forward an expert opinion. The Commonwealth doesn’t just attack the opinion. They attack the foundation underneath the person giving it. Then the jury decides what — and WHO — they believe. Watch this exchange and tell me if you read his response the same way I did. 😂 #LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #PaulZeizel #Courtroom #TrialCoverage
# #ኢስላምና_ፍትህ‼️     የግብፅ አስተዳዳዳሪ የነበሩት የአምር ኢብነል ዓስ ልጅ ከአንድ ግብፃዊ ቂብጥ  (ክርስቲያን) ጋር በፈረስ ጉልበት ውድድር ያደርጋል። ግብጻዊው  የንጊሱን ልጅ ያሸንፈዋልደ ግብፃዊው ሲያሸንፈው፣ የአምር ልጅ በቁጣ ግብፃዊውን እየመታ
# #ኢስላምና_ፍትህ‼️ የግብፅ አስተዳዳዳሪ የነበሩት የአምር ኢብነል ዓስ ልጅ ከአንድ ግብፃዊ ቂብጥ (ክርስቲያን) ጋር በፈረስ ጉልበት ውድድር ያደርጋል። ግብጻዊው የንጊሱን ልጅ ያሸንፈዋልደ ግብፃዊው ሲያሸንፈው፣ የአምር ልጅ በቁጣ ግብፃዊውን እየመታ "እኔ የመሪ ልጅ ነኝ!" በማለት አታሸንፈኝም እያለ ይመካበታል። አሸናፊነቱንም ይቀማዋል። ግብፃዊው በደረሰበት በደል አዝኖ አቤቱታውን ይዞ ወደ መድና በመሄድ ለኸሊፋው ኡመር ኢብኑል ኸጧብ (ረ.ዐ) አበሰረ። ​የኡመር (ረ.ዐ) ውሳኔና ቅጣት ኡመር (ረ.ዐ) አምር ኢብነል ዓስን እና ልጃቸውን ወዲያውኑ ወደ መድና እንዲመጡ ትእዛዝ አስተላለፉ። ​: ሁለቱም መድና ሲደርሱ ኡመር ግብፃዊውን ጠርተው ያንን አለንጋ በእጁ በመስጠት "የንጉሱን ልጅ ምታው!" በማለት የበቀል ምላሹን በራሱ እጅ እንዲወስድ አደረጉ። ግብፃዊውም የአምርን ልጅ በደንብ መታው። ​ በመቀጠልም ኡመር ግብፃዊውን "አለንጋውን በአምር ራስ ላይ አድርግ፣ ምክንያቱም ልጁ በአባቱ ስልጣን ተመክቶ ነው የደበደበህ" አሉት። ግብፃዊው ግን "እኔ የደበደበኝን ሰው መትቼበታለሁ" አባቱ ምን አዴረገኝ በማለት ተወው። በዚህ ክስተት ኡመር ኢብኑል ኸጧብ ለአምር ኢብነል ዓስ የሚከተለውን የታሪክ መዝገብ የሆነ ንግግር ተናገሩ፡ ​"እናንተ እናቶቻቸው በነፃነት የወለዷቸውን ልጆቻቸኽን መቼ ነው ባሪያ ያደረጋችኋቸው?" ሁሉም ሰው እኩል ነው። ኢስላም ይኸንን ነው ያስተማረን አልሃምዱሊላህ‼️ #

About