@mikepaltad: Ayaka is nuts for Taiyo #missionyozakurafamily #missionyozakurafamilyanime #missionyozakurafamilyedit #missionyozakurafamilymanga #missionyozakurafamilyepisode6 #taiyoasano #ayakakirisaki #shionyozakura #mutsumiyozakura #spy #comedy #shonen #funnyanimemoments #animememes #animereelsedit #viralanime #animereels #trendingreels

mikepaltad
mikepaltad
Open In TikTok:
Region: PH
Sunday 12 May 2024 14:29:41 GMT
557
9
1
0

Music

Download

Comments

farmiuvcljf
❀zby_ my❀ :
😂
2025-10-17 11:37:38
0
To see more videos from user @mikepaltad, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

Everyone’s reacting to the Miami entertainer who says she made $710k in 2024, paid herself $200k as “reasonable compensation” from her S‑corp, and claimed $148k in write‑offs as a dancer. From a tax perspective, the structure itself isn’t the wild part. An S‑corp for a high‑earning entertainer is totally normal, reporting 1099 income plus additional self‑reported cash is exactly how it’s supposed to work, and having legitimate business expenses is expected. Where things get interesting is what she’s calling a “write‑off” and how low that salary looks when basically all the revenue is her personal services. Most people don’t realize that things like regular hair, nails, lashes, and everyday glam are almost never deductible, even if your entire brand is your appearance and you’re on stage or on camera for a living. Courts have denied those types of grooming expenses over and over as inherently personal, regardless of how “necessary” they feel for the job. On top of that, when a one‑person S‑corp is generating hundreds of thousands of dollars purely from the owner’s labor, setting a relatively low wage and taking the rest as distribution is exactly the pattern the IRS pays attention to when they talk about “reasonable compensation.” If you’re an entertainer, creator, or service‑based business owner watching this and using this video as your tax blueprint, be careful. The difference between a smart structure and an audit magnet usually isn’t the entity; it’s how aggressive you get on grooming and lifestyle deductions, and how defensible your “reasonable salary” really is when someone asks you to prove it. #tax #finance #business #TaxTok #TaxTips #CPA #writeoff
Everyone’s reacting to the Miami entertainer who says she made $710k in 2024, paid herself $200k as “reasonable compensation” from her S‑corp, and claimed $148k in write‑offs as a dancer. From a tax perspective, the structure itself isn’t the wild part. An S‑corp for a high‑earning entertainer is totally normal, reporting 1099 income plus additional self‑reported cash is exactly how it’s supposed to work, and having legitimate business expenses is expected. Where things get interesting is what she’s calling a “write‑off” and how low that salary looks when basically all the revenue is her personal services. Most people don’t realize that things like regular hair, nails, lashes, and everyday glam are almost never deductible, even if your entire brand is your appearance and you’re on stage or on camera for a living. Courts have denied those types of grooming expenses over and over as inherently personal, regardless of how “necessary” they feel for the job. On top of that, when a one‑person S‑corp is generating hundreds of thousands of dollars purely from the owner’s labor, setting a relatively low wage and taking the rest as distribution is exactly the pattern the IRS pays attention to when they talk about “reasonable compensation.” If you’re an entertainer, creator, or service‑based business owner watching this and using this video as your tax blueprint, be careful. The difference between a smart structure and an audit magnet usually isn’t the entity; it’s how aggressive you get on grooming and lifestyle deductions, and how defensible your “reasonable salary” really is when someone asks you to prove it. #tax #finance #business #TaxTok #TaxTips #CPA #writeoff

About