@user7565245465370:

الزرداب

Open In TikTok:

Region: LY

Saturday 29 June 2024 21:26:30 GMT

13369

620

49

132

Music

Download

No Watermark .mp4 (4.1MB) No Watermark(HD) .mp4 (4.1MB) Watermark .mp4 (0MB) Music .mp3

Comments

Malik eshtawi :

كبير يا حويج☝🏽🦅

2024-06-29 23:38:01

11

Soso sh ra :

💚💚💚💚الخبير حبير كل حاجه تبي هلهاً

2024-06-30 16:33:17

2

FA Dw :

الله يبارك الف مبروك ياحاج ❤️

2024-06-30 01:33:14

2

☄️.الغرياني.☄️ :

الله يبارك

2024-06-30 12:50:20

1

Ayoub sh :

نشهد بالله تستاهل ياحاج ان شاءالله ديما بريما

2024-06-29 23:23:58

1

ولد البادية :

الله ايبارك الف مبوك

2024-06-29 22:56:16

1

القيصر القيصر :

الفارس عادل محمد ميلاد القيادي ربي يبارك منورين

2024-06-30 13:51:30

1

بحر :

الله يبارك تبارك الرحمن الف الف مبروك الاصابعه العز والفخر

2024-06-30 00:26:54

1

ghjkkhnkkf :

نشهد بالله تستاهل ياحاج اسماعيل

2024-06-30 08:16:18

1

الصقر :

الله يبارك ربي يحفطك ياحاج

2024-06-30 11:19:18

1

اساور العمر :

هلهاااا يااااعمي اسماعيل

2024-06-30 23:29:36

1

mahamed :

الله يبارك

2024-06-29 21:49:12

1

احمد البشتي موسى :

الف الف مبروك شايخ الحاج 🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰

2024-06-30 23:20:44

1

ابراهيم زائد التاجوري :

اللهم صل على النبي

2024-06-30 11:14:59

1

عزيزة الساحلي :

الله أكبر

2024-11-18 05:55:30

0

عادل القيادي :

🥰🥰💚

2024-07-04 00:00:05

1

princess 2007✨️ :

❤️❤️❤️👌

2024-06-29 22:05:37

1

“FATHE” :

💚💚💚💚💚

2024-07-25 22:33:29

0

user9i08xuxuuj :

🥰

2024-07-03 21:29:16

0

om jo :

💚💚💚💚الف مبروك وان شالله الفوز با الانتخابات

2024-07-04 13:30:34

0

M :

صورني وانا مش داري #صورني وانا عامل نفسي مش عارف معا الانتصار لاكن مش صغارك ولا معاك

2024-06-30 11:22:51

0

أيلا HM :

ريتي الشايب اصحيح شكله ايتنطر الله يبارك 🤣😂

2024-07-04 20:02:38

0

ًبنت الاهلي 💚💚🇳🇬🇳🇬 :

الله يبارك 💚💚💚💚

2024-06-30 11:20:32

2

almoktar :

الله يبارك الف الف مبروك🥰

2024-06-30 22:10:24

2

Khatt fat :

الف مبروك استاد إسماعيل اشتيوي 🥰

2024-07-02 13:07:19

1

soso 2679 :

🥰🥰🥰الفرحه مش عادي الحق تعبريهم عفوي

2024-07-02 03:40:12

1

الوردة ~ البيضاء :

الف مبروك 🌷👌

2024-07-01 22:17:40

1

السنوسي :

ماشاءالله تبارك الله

2024-07-02 17:52:34

1

Enaami :

😂😂😂

2024-07-01 18:30:48

1

الافندي ☠️ :

💚💚💚💚💚

2024-06-29 21:37:07

1

“FATHE” :

كنت احد مصوري الحدث منور دفعة

2024-07-25 22:33:24

1

محمد ليبي :

ألف مبروك

2024-06-30 12:57:17

1

khalid asor :

الف مبروك 🎉

2024-06-30 11:58:11

1

🦌🩷 :

ربي يحفظهم العين حق ❤️❤️

2024-07-29 21:26:57

1

Alhart 32 :

ألف ألف ألف مبروك الفوز

2024-06-30 02:12:01

1

الافندي ☠️ :

💚💚

2024-06-29 21:56:17

1

الافندي ☠️ :

💯💯💯💯

2024-06-29 21:37:03

1

𝐻𝑜𝑜𝓇 🇱🇾 :

الله عالفرحه

2024-06-29 23:05:58

1

منير اشتيوي :

الف الف مبروك

2024-06-30 03:00:52

1

مصطفى البوسيفي البوسيفي :

الله ايبارك

2024-06-30 03:31:10

1

عطر الورد :

كل واحد ربي يعطيه علي قيس نيته ....ربي يدوم انتصارتكم

2024-06-30 07:19:08

1

Farag Almalas :

💚🔥💪

2024-06-30 08:06:51

1

Mohammed :

شايخ الحاج✌️✌️😂😂

2024-06-30 10:40:17

1

منو :

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

2024-09-05 14:46:00

0

MOHAMMED GHRSALLA :

الف ألف مبروك يا حاج

2024-07-07 01:02:20

0

مراد Ⓜ️ :

الله ايبارك 👍

2024-06-30 14:16:41

0

To see more videos from user @user7565245465370, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

Thomas Detry finds an eagle on the 5th. Moving to -3 for the Championship. #TheOpen

Thomas Detry finds an eagle on the 5th. Moving to -3 for the Championship. #TheOpen

$Graham's number is an immense number that arose as an upper bound on the answer of a problem in the mathematical field of Ramsey theory. It is much larger than many other large numbers introduced as effective bounds in mathematics, such as Skewes's bound, which in turn is much larger than a googolplex. Graham's number is so large that the observable universe is far too small to contain its ordinary digital representation, assuming that each digit occupies one Planck volume. But even the number of digits in this digital representation of Graham's number would itself be a number so large that its digital representation cannot be represented in the observable universe. Nor even can the number of digits of that number—and so forth, for a number of times far exceeding the total number of Planck volumes in the observable universe. Thus, Graham's number cannot be expressed even by physical universe-scale power towers of the form a b c ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ {\displaystyle a^{b^{c^{\cdot ^{\cdot ^{\cdot }}}}}}, even though Graham's number is indeed a power of three. However, Graham's number can be explicitly given by computable recursive formulas using Knuth's up-arrow notation or equivalent, as was done by Ronald Graham, the number's namesake. As there is a recursive formula to define it, it is much smaller than typical busy beaver numbers, the sequence of which grows faster than any computable sequence. Though too large to ever be computed in full, the sequence of digits of Graham's number can be computed explicitly via simple algorithms; the last 10 digits of Graham's number are ...2464195387.[1] Using Knuth's up-arrow notation, Graham's number is g 64 {\displaystyle g_{64}},[2] where g n = { 3↑↑↑↑3, if n=1 and 3 ↑ g n − 1 3, if n≥2. {\displaystyle g_{n}={\begin{cases}3\uparrow \uparrow \uparrow \uparrow 3,&{\text{if }}n=1{\text{ and}}\\3\uparrow ^{g_{n-1}}3,&{\text{if }}n\geq 2.\end{cases}}} Graham's number was used by Graham in conversations with popular science writer Martin Gardner as a simplified explanation of the upper bounds of the problem he was working on. In 1977, Gardner described the number in Scientific American, introducing it to the general public. At the time of its introduction, it was the largest specific positive integer ever to have been used in a published mathematical proof. The number was described in the 1980 Guinness Book of World Records, adding to its popular interest. Other specific integers (such as TREE(3)) known to be far larger than Graham's number have since appeared in many serious mathematical proofs, for example in connection with Harvey Friedman's various finite forms of Kruskal's theorem. Additionally, smaller upper bounds on the Ramsey theory problem from which Graham's number was derived have since been proven to be valid. #tcc #42099 #🍵🌊🌊$
Graham's number is an immense number that arose as an upper bound on the answer of a problem in the mathematical field of Ramsey theory. It is much larger than many other large numbers introduced as effective bounds in mathematics, such as Skewes's bound, which in turn is much larger than a googolplex. Graham's number is so large that the observable universe is far too small to contain its ordinary digital representation, assuming that each digit occupies one Planck volume. But even the number of digits in this digital representation of Graham's number would itself be a number so large that its digital representation cannot be represented in the observable universe. Nor even can the number of digits of that number—and so forth, for a number of times far exceeding the total number of Planck volumes in the observable universe. Thus, Graham's number cannot be expressed even by physical universe-scale power towers of the form a b c ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ {\displaystyle a^{b^{c^{\cdot ^{\cdot ^{\cdot }}}}}}, even though Graham's number is indeed a power of three. However, Graham's number can be explicitly given by computable recursive formulas using Knuth's up-arrow notation or equivalent, as was done by Ronald Graham, the number's namesake. As there is a recursive formula to define it, it is much smaller than typical busy beaver numbers, the sequence of which grows faster than any computable sequence. Though too large to ever be computed in full, the sequence of digits of Graham's number can be computed explicitly via simple algorithms; the last 10 digits of Graham's number are ...2464195387.[1] Using Knuth's up-arrow notation, Graham's number is g 64 {\displaystyle g_{64}},[2] where g n = { 3↑↑↑↑3, if n=1 and 3 ↑ g n − 1 3, if n≥2. {\displaystyle g_{n}={\begin{cases}3\uparrow \uparrow \uparrow \uparrow 3,&{\text{if }}n=1{\text{ and}}\\3\uparrow ^{g_{n-1}}3,&{\text{if }}n\geq 2.\end{cases}}} Graham's number was used by Graham in conversations with popular science writer Martin Gardner as a simplified explanation of the upper bounds of the problem he was working on. In 1977, Gardner described the number in Scientific American, introducing it to the general public. At the time of its introduction, it was the largest specific positive integer ever to have been used in a published mathematical proof. The number was described in the 1980 Guinness Book of World Records, adding to its popular interest. Other specific integers (such as TREE(3)) known to be far larger than Graham's number have since appeared in many serious mathematical proofs, for example in connection with Harvey Friedman's various finite forms of Kruskal's theorem. Additionally, smaller upper bounds on the Ramsey theory problem from which Graham's number was derived have since been proven to be valid. #tcc #42099 #🍵🌊🌊

la dernière partie, merci Louis 🤎

la dernière partie, merci Louis 🤎

بحضني وتقولي حبيبي😓🤚🏻. #sarahcamero

بحضني وتقولي حبيبي😓🤚🏻. #sarahcamero

#لايك__explore___ فعلاً العالم مصاب بأزمة أخلاق

#لايك__explore___ فعلاً العالم مصاب بأزمة أخلاق

About

Robot
API

Legal

Privacy Policy