@hanhchiase.xaykenh: Hạnh làm sao để nói mượt vậy ?? #huongdantiktok #tiepthilienket #affiliate #huongdanxaykenhtiktok #kiemtientiktok #LearnOnTikTok #hanhchiase

Hạnh Chia Sẻ ☘️

Open In TikTok:

Region: VN

Saturday 19 July 2025 03:25:42 GMT

7219

165

33

25

Music

Download

No Watermark .mp4 (6.95MB) No Watermark(HD) .mp4 (7.36MB) Watermark .mp4 (0MB) Music .mp3

Comments

Út Sin :

chị nói hay quá. giọng chị nghe cuốn quá

2025-07-19 03:32:45

2

Mẹ của Mít đây :

Chị quay video như nào để ng nét khung cảnh mờ dc ạ

2025-07-19 06:57:14

1

Ngọc Khánh Chy :

c quay cam trước hay sau mà nét zữ vậy ạ? quay xong c có chỉnh net app nào k c?

2025-07-19 14:10:43

1

Si So đây nè ✌️ :

Hâhha hóa ra là vậy ạ 🤣

2025-07-23 13:35:08

1

Hà bán áo 95 ☘️ :

Em mà quay 1 cái video hơn chục lần

2025-07-19 07:33:49

1

Hải 1990 :

Mình cũng hay nói vấp 😂 có khi quay đi quay lại 3 ngày mới được cái video

2025-07-21 12:21:02

0

Quyền Ca :

Hay c

2025-07-19 03:37:54

0

Mẹ 2 Su❤️ :

Em cũng vậy nói ậm àh ậm ừ miết 😭😭

2025-07-19 08:21:16

0

Nguyễn Thuỳ Dương 610 :

Hay ạ. Bình thường em toàn quay lại thôi. Quay đi quay lại mãi. Quay xong bị mệt 🤣🤣

2025-10-01 10:51:50

0

Little Things I Love :

Em mới lập kênh, thu âm cho clip 1phut mà mất một tiếng luôn 😅

2025-08-03 09:54:52

0

Tạp Hoá Mẹ Vân🍀 :

Hehe chuẩn luôn chị

2025-07-20 05:09:37

1

Hoàng Tuấn2631999 :

Kk

2025-07-25 11:22:59

0

BA LÓC :

Mình quay 1 video cũng hơn cả tiếng, edit thêm 2 tiếng nữa là hết nửa ngày.

2025-07-19 17:28:57

0

Hiền Tạp hoá :

Còn bị nhịu lời nói nữa có ai bị ảnh hưởng sau sinh như e k

2025-07-19 17:22:31

1

Kiều Trinh :

Cảm ơn chị đã chia sẻ

2025-07-19 09:08:11

0

Hoa Ngũ Cốc :

Tuyệt vời quá em ạ

2025-07-30 13:43:24

0

Tạp Hoá Nhà Bình :

😂 Giờ mới biết

2025-07-26 06:58:00

0

Mẹ bé Bơ🥰 :

😂😂

2025-07-20 07:06:42

0

Thanh Nga :

🙏

2025-07-26 05:01:28

0

Heo BamBoo :

C ơi c có dạy làm ticktok ko ạ

2025-08-05 18:08:05

0

Chăm Trịnh :

chị nói đúng, nói vấp thì nói lại, vậy thôi 😂😂😂😂😂

2025-07-22 14:43:14

1

Thanh Hương :

hihi

2025-07-21 11:02:15

0

To see more videos from user @hanhchiase.xaykenh, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

💪 Build Bigger Forearms & a Stronger Grip Train both sides of your forearms with these 3 effective barbell exercises: 1️⃣ Reverse Barbell Wrist Curl — Palms Down 🎯 Target: Wrist Extensors 3–4 sets × 12–20 reps 2️⃣ Barbell Wrist Curl — Palms Up 🎯 Target: Wrist Flexors 3–4 sets × 12–20 reps 3️⃣ Reverse Barbell Curl — Standing 🎯 Target: Brachioradialis 3–4 sets × 8–15 reps Train forearms 2× per week, keep every rep controlled, and progressively increase the resistance as you get stronger. 🔥💪 💪 Save this and come back stronger.

💪 Build Bigger Forearms & a Stronger Grip Train both sides of your forearms with these 3 effective barbell exercises: 1️⃣ Reverse Barbell Wrist Curl — Palms Down 🎯 Target: Wrist Extensors 3–4 sets × 12–20 reps 2️⃣ Barbell Wrist Curl — Palms Up 🎯 Target: Wrist Flexors 3–4 sets × 12–20 reps 3️⃣ Reverse Barbell Curl — Standing 🎯 Target: Brachioradialis 3–4 sets × 8–15 reps Train forearms 2× per week, keep every rep controlled, and progressively increase the resistance as you get stronger. 🔥💪 💪 Save this and come back stronger.

Stopsliding,startlookingfly.⚡️Fromslipperypooldeckstocitystreets,thesearetheultimatetechwearupgrade.Thatgripisnojoke.😤 #TikTokShopSummerSale Getyoursbeforethey’regone!#clogs#summeressentials#slipproof#ootdmen

Stopsliding,startlookingfly.⚡️Fromslipperypooldeckstocitystreets,thesearetheultimatetechwearupgrade.Thatgripisnojoke.😤 #TikTokShopSummerSale Getyoursbeforethey’regone!#clogs#summeressentials#slipproof#ootdmen

#تراثنا_فخرنا_وهويتنا_لم_ولن_نتخلى_عنها💪🎊 #دارحمر_دارحامد_كبابيش_مجانين_شنابله_🥀 #بزعه_دارحامد_بني_جرار_جوامعه #تراثنا_فخرنا_وهويتنا

#تراثنا_فخرنا_وهويتنا_لم_ولن_نتخلى_عنها💪🎊 #دارحمر_دارحامد_كبابيش_مجانين_شنابله_🥀 #بزعه_دارحامد_بني_جرار_جوامعه #تراثنا_فخرنا_وهويتنا

HUT ke-5 GBI Imanuel Aimas, Momentum Perkuat Iman dan Persaudaraan #Papuabaratdaya #BeritaPapua #papuabaratdaya #sorong #fypシ #ElisaKambu #GBI

HUT ke-5 GBI Imanuel Aimas, Momentum Perkuat Iman dan Persaudaraan #Papuabaratdaya #BeritaPapua #papuabaratdaya #sorong #fypシ #ElisaKambu #GBI

Graham's number is a very large number that arose as an upper bound on the answer of a problem in the mathematical field of Ramsey theory. It is much larger than many other large numbers introduced as effective bounds in mathematics, such as Skewes's bound, which in turn is much larger than a googolplex. Graham's number is so large that the observable universe is far too small to contain its ordinary digital representation, assuming that each digit occupies one Planck volume. But even the number of digits in this digital representation of Graham's number would itself be a number so large that its digital representation cannot be represented in the observable universe. Nor even can the number of digits of that number—and so forth, for a number of times far exceeding the total number of Planck volumes in the observable universe. Thus, Graham's number cannot be expressed even by physical universe-scale power towers of the form abc⋅⋅⋅, even though Graham's number is indeed a power of three. However, Graham's number can be explicitly given by computable recursive formulas using Knuth's up-arrow notation or equivalent, as was done by Ronald Graham, the number's namesake. As there is a recursive formula to define it, it is much smaller than typical busy beaver numbers, the sequence of which grows faster than any computable sequence. Though too large to ever be computed in full, the sequence of digits of Graham's number can be computed explicitly via simple algorithms; the last 10 digits of Graham's number are ...2464195387.[1] Using Knuth's up-arrow notation, Graham's number is g64,[2] wheregn={3↑↑↑↑3,if n=1 and3↑gn−13,if n≥2. Graham's number was used by Graham in conversations with popular science writer Martin Gardner as a simplified explanation of the upper bounds of the problem he was working on. In 1977, Gardner described the number in Scientific American, introducing it to the general public. At the time of its introduction, it was the largest specific positive integer ever to have been used in a published mathematical proof. The number was described in the 1980 Guinness Book of World Records, adding to its popular interest. Other specific integers (such as TREE(3)) known to be far larger than Graham's number have since appeared in many serious mathematical proofs, for example in connection with Harvey Friedman's various finite forms of Kruskal's theorem. Additionally, smaller upper bounds on the Ramsey theory problem from which Graham's number was derived have since been proven to be valid.i hate nobody tik tok peace love and positivity actor in video is my cousin #vrilliant #hERo #fakeAI #animeedit

Graham's number is a very large number that arose as an upper bound on the answer of a problem in the mathematical field of Ramsey theory. It is much larger than many other large numbers introduced as effective bounds in mathematics, such as Skewes's bound, which in turn is much larger than a googolplex. Graham's number is so large that the observable universe is far too small to contain its ordinary digital representation, assuming that each digit occupies one Planck volume. But even the number of digits in this digital representation of Graham's number would itself be a number so large that its digital representation cannot be represented in the observable universe. Nor even can the number of digits of that number—and so forth, for a number of times far exceeding the total number of Planck volumes in the observable universe. Thus, Graham's number cannot be expressed even by physical universe-scale power towers of the form abc⋅⋅⋅, even though Graham's number is indeed a power of three. However, Graham's number can be explicitly given by computable recursive formulas using Knuth's up-arrow notation or equivalent, as was done by Ronald Graham, the number's namesake. As there is a recursive formula to define it, it is much smaller than typical busy beaver numbers, the sequence of which grows faster than any computable sequence. Though too large to ever be computed in full, the sequence of digits of Graham's number can be computed explicitly via simple algorithms; the last 10 digits of Graham's number are ...2464195387.[1] Using Knuth's up-arrow notation, Graham's number is g64,[2] wheregn={3↑↑↑↑3,if n=1 and3↑gn−13,if n≥2. Graham's number was used by Graham in conversations with popular science writer Martin Gardner as a simplified explanation of the upper bounds of the problem he was working on. In 1977, Gardner described the number in Scientific American, introducing it to the general public. At the time of its introduction, it was the largest specific positive integer ever to have been used in a published mathematical proof. The number was described in the 1980 Guinness Book of World Records, adding to its popular interest. Other specific integers (such as TREE(3)) known to be far larger than Graham's number have since appeared in many serious mathematical proofs, for example in connection with Harvey Friedman's various finite forms of Kruskal's theorem. Additionally, smaller upper bounds on the Ramsey theory problem from which Graham's number was derived have since been proven to be valid.i hate nobody tik tok peace love and positivity actor in video is my cousin #vrilliant #hERo #fakeAI #animeedit

اللهم اني أستودعتك شبابي#مافيني_حيل_احط_هاشتاقات #الشعب_الصيني_ماله_حل😂😂 #تصميم_فيديوهات🎶🎤🎬 #اليمن_صنعاء_تعز_اب_ذمار_عدن_وطن_واحد تعز اب عدن صنعاء

اللهم اني أستودعتك شبابي#مافيني_حيل_احط_هاشتاقات #الشعب_الصيني_ماله_حل😂😂 #تصميم_فيديوهات🎶🎤🎬 #اليمن_صنعاء_تعز_اب_ذمار_عدن_وطن_واحد تعز اب عدن صنعاء

About

Robot
API

Legal

Privacy Policy