@mdksjksj084:

dudaa😘🤙🏽

Open In TikTok:

Region: BR

Sunday 10 August 2025 03:24:37 GMT

255

Music

Download

No Watermark .mp4 (2.09MB) No Watermark(HD) .mp4 (2.09MB) Watermark .mp4 (0MB) Music .mp3

Comments

There are no more comments for this video.

To see more videos from user @mdksjksj084, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

😻

Tem dán xe cú đấm sấm sét cực ngầu #creatorsearchinsights #ilovetiktok

#wlw #fyp #حب #اكسبلور #foryoupage

اِس منافق معاشرے میں جینے کے لیے انسان کے پاس دو چیزوں میں سے ایک ضرور ہونی چاہیے: یا قارون جیسی دولت یا حضرت ایوبؑ جیسا صبر۔#fyp #foryoupage #foryou #viral #unfrezzmyaccount

$Wife: About $3 million. Judge: And today? Wife: Approximately $60 million. The judge looked at the prenup. Judge: Was the $1 million provision negotiated? Wife: Yes. Judge: Did you have your own attorney? Wife: Yes. Judge: Did your attorney explain the provision to you? Wife: Yes. Judge: Were you given financial information before signing? Wife: Yes. Judge: Were you pressured into signing? Wife: No. Judge: Did the agreement provide for the $1 million to increase with Husband’s net worth? Wife: No. Judge: An inflation adjustment? Wife: No. Judge: A percentage of his assets? Wife: No. The judge looked at Husband. Judge: Why was it a fixed $1 million? Husband: Because we wanted certainty. Judge: Certainty for whom? Husband: Both of us. The wife shook her head. Wife: It gave him certainty. I just didn’t understand what $1 million would mean twenty-two years later. Judge: What do you mean? Wife: When we signed it, $1 million was roughly a third of everything he owned. She looked at her husband. Wife: Today it’s less than two percent. The room went quiet. Wife: I gave up my career. I raised our children. I supported him while he built the company that made him wealthy. Husband: And we agreed on the $1 million. Wife: When you were worth $3 million. Husband: You can’t use the fact that my business succeeded as a reason to change our agreement. The judge nodded. Judge: That’s the issue. She turned back to the wife. Judge: Did you negotiate a percentage?Wife: No. Judge: Did you ask for a provision that would adjust with Husband’s wealth? Wife: No. Judge: Did Husband conceal his financial circumstances from you? Wife: No. Judge: Were you denied independent legal advice? Wife: No. The judge closed the file. Judge: Then I don’t have a basis, on these facts, to simply replace the agreement with one you wish you had negotiated. The wife looked stunned. Wife: So after twenty-two years, I’m still bound by a number we chose when we were 29?Judge: If the agreement is enforceable under the applicable law, yes. The judge paused. Judge: That’s precisely why people are advised to think carefully about fixed-dollar provisions in long-term marriages. The $1 million provision was enforced. The husband kept the additional wealth protected by the prenup. And the wife walked away knowing that the number she’d once considered enormous was now a tiny fraction of the fortune her husband had built.$
Wife: About $3 million. Judge: And today? Wife: Approximately $60 million. The judge looked at the prenup. Judge: Was the $1 million provision negotiated? Wife: Yes. Judge: Did you have your own attorney? Wife: Yes. Judge: Did your attorney explain the provision to you? Wife: Yes. Judge: Were you given financial information before signing? Wife: Yes. Judge: Were you pressured into signing? Wife: No. Judge: Did the agreement provide for the $1 million to increase with Husband’s net worth? Wife: No. Judge: An inflation adjustment? Wife: No. Judge: A percentage of his assets? Wife: No. The judge looked at Husband. Judge: Why was it a fixed $1 million? Husband: Because we wanted certainty. Judge: Certainty for whom? Husband: Both of us. The wife shook her head. Wife: It gave him certainty. I just didn’t understand what $1 million would mean twenty-two years later. Judge: What do you mean? Wife: When we signed it, $1 million was roughly a third of everything he owned. She looked at her husband. Wife: Today it’s less than two percent. The room went quiet. Wife: I gave up my career. I raised our children. I supported him while he built the company that made him wealthy. Husband: And we agreed on the $1 million. Wife: When you were worth $3 million. Husband: You can’t use the fact that my business succeeded as a reason to change our agreement. The judge nodded. Judge: That’s the issue. She turned back to the wife. Judge: Did you negotiate a percentage?Wife: No. Judge: Did you ask for a provision that would adjust with Husband’s wealth? Wife: No. Judge: Did Husband conceal his financial circumstances from you? Wife: No. Judge: Were you denied independent legal advice? Wife: No. The judge closed the file. Judge: Then I don’t have a basis, on these facts, to simply replace the agreement with one you wish you had negotiated. The wife looked stunned. Wife: So after twenty-two years, I’m still bound by a number we chose when we were 29?Judge: If the agreement is enforceable under the applicable law, yes. The judge paused. Judge: That’s precisely why people are advised to think carefully about fixed-dollar provisions in long-term marriages. The $1 million provision was enforced. The husband kept the additional wealth protected by the prenup. And the wife walked away knowing that the number she’d once considered enormous was now a tiny fraction of the fortune her husband had built.

Gemini Hùng Huỳnh - 'Đẹp Mã' | OPENVERSE #GeminiHungHuynh #DepMa #Tiemgaudepmachallenge

@mdksjksj084:

dudaa😘🤙🏽

Open In TikTok:

Region: BR

Sunday 10 August 2025 03:24:37 GMT

Music

Download

Comments

Other Videos

About

Legal