@brwaamir: ئاخر کێ وەکو منە ؟🖤 Mohsen Yeganeh 🤍#foryou #farsi #sulaymaniyah #irbil #mohsenyeganeh

Brwa Amir
Brwa Amir
Open In TikTok:
Region: IQ
Tuesday 23 December 2025 19:03:22 GMT
132948
9284
67
1093

Music

Download

Comments

alayayub
﮼نەوەکەی ﮼حاجی ﮼عومەر*🖤🦅 :
Bminawa 😍
2025-12-24 11:32:29
3
p_chem0
﮼پەیام🥀 :
Bzhit🥲💔
2025-12-24 14:09:59
2
sauyn215
ℳ𝒪𝒪𝒩🌚 :
ئاخر کێ بۆ تۆ وەکو منە...🌚
2025-12-24 01:05:20
4
zen1m4m
زینـە :
ئاخر کێ وەک منە بۆ تۆ 😍!
2025-12-29 01:11:54
4
itszinully
زینہ :
taibat🥺❤
2025-12-23 20:37:16
1
ii_ez4bel
𝐸𝑍𝐴b𝐸𝐿🖤🐼 :
Bmene bram 🤍
2025-12-23 19:33:53
2
azhin6_11
𝐚𝐳𝐡𝐚 :
Posty mohsen har la xou jwana Bubumm♥️
2025-12-23 19:16:41
1
tasyan_6
𝐓𝐚𝐬𝐲𝐚𝐧 ...♡ :
brwa 🤍
2025-12-23 19:16:43
1
closed3432
🌺 :
اخە کی واسە تو مثل منە؟🥀
2026-01-15 22:06:36
0
pa_ya_m
pa_ya_ :
Dwan wak ama benn
2025-12-25 10:11:03
1
brwaosmanhama
brwaosman :
موحسین دل و رۆح
2025-12-23 19:14:35
1
m44rr11yy
Maarrii.🤎 :
shazz u juannn wak hamishaa❤
2025-12-23 19:44:44
2
luv.s0oma
కꪮꪑꪖ🤍. :
ئاخر کێ بۆتۆ وەک منە؟.
2026-01-21 18:37:55
0
the.thunder98
Tԋυɳԃҽɾ🤍⚡ :
Bzhit Azizi Mnn😍🔥
2025-12-24 20:46:09
1
rebagyan97
❝ 𝘳𝐞𝑏𝕒_! ❞ :
kaka🖤
2025-12-23 20:11:11
1
ii_ez4bel
𝐸𝑍𝐴b𝐸𝐿🖤🐼 :
Taibat 🤍
2025-12-23 19:34:20
1
azhin6_11
𝐚𝐳𝐡𝐚 :
Bemoonnnn..🙂❤️‍🩹
2025-12-23 19:16:16
1
tasyan_6
𝐓𝐚𝐬𝐲𝐚𝐧 ...♡ :
wak hamu kat jwan trena ,, aw goranya 🥺
2025-12-23 19:16:55
1
azhin6_11
𝐚𝐳𝐡𝐚 :
Dyar nabuy shera wamzani sa7akau choll krdwa 🥲
2025-12-23 19:15:48
3
sivaa.aaa8
SivAa🖤 :
ئـاخـر کـێـ بـۆ تـۆ وەك مـنـە🖤..!
2026-01-14 19:48:56
0
swtawa23
rawa_azadi :
@anyaa'🖤🥀 wala kas🥰♥️
2025-12-24 14:18:42
1
asoalmany455
🅐🅢🅞 🅐🅛🅜🅐🅝🅔 :
🥰
2025-12-27 19:11:57
1
halmat.arafa
Halmat Karkuky :
💔😔
2025-12-26 16:37:43
1
shya_ahmed
shya🌸 :
🥺
2026-01-04 17:12:36
1
To see more videos from user @brwaamir, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

My best friend core: (Graham's number is an immense number that arose as an upper bound on the answer of a problem in the mathematical field of Ramsey theory. It is much larger than many other large numbers introduced as effective bounds in mathematics, such as Skewes's bound, which in turn is much larger than a googolplex. Graham's number is so large that the observable universe is far too small to contain its ordinary digital representation, assuming that each digit occupies one Planck volume. But even the number of digits in this digital representation of Graham's number would itself be a number so large that its digital representation cannot be represented in the observable universe. Nor even can the number of digits of that number—and so forth, for a number of times far exceeding the total number of Planck volumes in the observable universe. Graham's number was used by Graham in conversations with popular science writer Martin Gardner as a simplified explanation of the upper bounds of the problem he was working on. In 1977, Gardner described the number in Scientific American, introducing it to the general public. At the time of its introduction, it was the largest specific positive integer ever to have been used in a published mathematical proof. The number was described in the 1980 Guinness Book of World Records, adding to its popular interest. Other specific integers (such as TREE(3)) known to be far larger than Graham's number have since appeared in many serious mathematical proofs, for example in connection with Harvey Friedman's various finite forms of Kruskal's theorem. Additionally, smaller upper bounds on the Ramsey theory problem from which Graham's number was derived have since been proven to be valid.) #foryourpage #based #truecringecomunnity #payton
My best friend core: (Graham's number is an immense number that arose as an upper bound on the answer of a problem in the mathematical field of Ramsey theory. It is much larger than many other large numbers introduced as effective bounds in mathematics, such as Skewes's bound, which in turn is much larger than a googolplex. Graham's number is so large that the observable universe is far too small to contain its ordinary digital representation, assuming that each digit occupies one Planck volume. But even the number of digits in this digital representation of Graham's number would itself be a number so large that its digital representation cannot be represented in the observable universe. Nor even can the number of digits of that number—and so forth, for a number of times far exceeding the total number of Planck volumes in the observable universe. Graham's number was used by Graham in conversations with popular science writer Martin Gardner as a simplified explanation of the upper bounds of the problem he was working on. In 1977, Gardner described the number in Scientific American, introducing it to the general public. At the time of its introduction, it was the largest specific positive integer ever to have been used in a published mathematical proof. The number was described in the 1980 Guinness Book of World Records, adding to its popular interest. Other specific integers (such as TREE(3)) known to be far larger than Graham's number have since appeared in many serious mathematical proofs, for example in connection with Harvey Friedman's various finite forms of Kruskal's theorem. Additionally, smaller upper bounds on the Ramsey theory problem from which Graham's number was derived have since been proven to be valid.) #foryourpage #based #truecringecomunnity #payton

About