@phutungxe95: Cảng led chạy màu anh em tham khảo nha#phutungxemay #phutungxe #phukienxe #phukienxemay #xh

Phụ Tùng Xe 95
Phụ Tùng Xe 95
Open In TikTok:
Region: VN
Wednesday 21 January 2026 06:32:57 GMT
39103
916
42
41

Music

Download

Comments

tuhoangngoc208
Hoang Tu 🇰🇷 :
Các cao nhân cho em hỏi lấy loại sirus về chế cho wave 50 đk
2026-02-18 09:17:10
1
levanquy2001
Q2K :
có bán lẻ đèn vs mạch ko ạ của mình bị gãy mất rồi
2026-02-14 10:00:53
0
thayy1233
thay họ hồ :
gắn ở xe máy sius
2026-02-16 00:41:20
0
gia.bao.201_
gia bảo :
lắp được cho galaxy ko ạ
2026-02-13 18:23:54
0
chinhmom3
không có gì 💯 :
giá bao nhiêu vậy
2026-02-12 08:00:35
0
anhphucvip
@Hoàng phúc :
Có cho satria không ạ
2026-07-05 05:57:40
0
yeuvo835107
yeu vo🧸 :
lắm đc cho wave 100/ 2009 đc không
2026-03-10 15:36:05
0
hmoobmuas268
Tháng Plus :
Có cho xe rsx ko
2026-04-07 09:59:36
0
20101987ttt
Bốp 2010 :
Lắp đc 133 ko shop ...bao nhiêu vôn v ạ
2026-01-29 05:29:25
0
meomapnek
Quốc Nam🎶🎵 :
gắn Sirius fi đời 2014 đc k a
2026-02-12 22:04:08
0
thanhbnh098
Thanh Bình 🎉🎉✈️✈️ :
wave lắp như nào
2026-02-20 14:54:56
0
user0775123479
lãng tử miền tây! :
gắn xe sisur xăng cơ 110 đc k shop
2026-05-22 14:15:26
0
sn.ng56580
Nào dọn xe đẹp đổi tên :
Ex 150 gắn đc ko shop
2026-05-26 00:02:37
0
decanl.knh123
Decanl kính123 :
Lh lấy số lượng dc ko
2026-05-28 02:04:55
0
tranle28836
TRAN LE 64 vinh long :
xe future duoc ko shop
2026-05-17 06:00:26
0
hremhrem82
Bư'h chery 🇨🇶😝 :
rsx 110 đc ko anh
2026-04-07 20:24:50
0
tuandann3
tuan✈️ :
Có cho vario k ạ
2026-06-17 23:17:09
0
toinhocoo1
khang kaha :
lắp như nào v
2026-06-20 10:07:16
0
thang_2_0_0_4
Minh Thắng 2.0.0.4 :
có hiệu ứng phanh kh ạ
2026-07-08 02:56:24
0
20101987ttt
Bốp 2010 :
ok shop nhá
2026-01-29 13:31:38
0
user8784845119154
user8784845119154 :
có lắp đc xe ex 135 ko e
2026-06-27 15:54:33
0
sinh.hyninhiu2025
anh yêu ❤️‍🩹 :
ab125
2026-02-03 01:57:13
0
chjen.mjnh
chjen_mjnh :
lắp đc cho sirius Fi ko shop
2026-02-01 13:25:30
0
khanhsirut_205
Khanh  :
Gán cho si 110 như zin hái là còn chết them vậy shop
2026-05-08 22:16:26
0
hngksor96
hưng candy🥷 :
Làm cho satria đi bro
2026-02-17 03:47:15
0
To see more videos from user @phutungxe95, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

dont support!#creatorsearchinsights #tcc #edit #tccedit #rampage  Graham’s number is an unimaginably massive upper bound used in a mathematical proof within a branch of combinatorics called Ramsey theory. For a long time, it held the Guinness World Record for the largest positive integer ever used in a serious mathematical proof. It is so large that the observable universe doesn't contain enough space to write down its digits, even if every digit occupied the smallest possible volume of space (a Planck volume). Here is a breakdown of how it’s built, why it exists, and just how big it really is.  1. The Math Behind It: Knuth's Up-Arrow Notation    To understand Graham's number, standard exponentiation (x^y) isn't powerful enough. Mathematicians use Knuth’s up-arrow notation, which builds higher levels of arithmetic operations.  * Single Arrow: Standard exponentiation.    3 up-arrow 3 = 3^3 = 27  * Double Arrow: A tower of exponents (tetration).    3 up-arrow up-arrow 3 = 3^(3^3) = 3^27 = 7,625,597,484,987  * Triple Arrow: A tower of towers.    3 up-arrow up-arrow up-arrow 3 means you create a tower of 3s that is over 7.6 trillion layers tall.  2. Building Graham's Number (G64)    Graham's number is constructed in 64 sequential steps or layers. We start with a value called g1: g1 = 3 up-arrow up-arrow up-arrow up-arrow 3 Even g1 is already too large to grasp. It uses four up-arrows. Now, we use the result of the previous layer to determine the number of arrows in the next layer:  * Layer 1 (g1): 3 up-arrow up-arrow up-arrow up-arrow 3  * Layer 2 (g2): 3 [g1 number of arrows] 3  * Layer 3 (g3): 3 [g2 number of arrows] 3  * ...  * Layer 64 (g64): Graham's Number (a tower of 3s with g63 arrows between them)  3. Why Was It Created?    In 1971, mathematician Ronald Graham was working on a problem in Ramsey theory, which looks for order in chaotic systems. Imagine an n-dimensional hypercube (a cube in higher dimensions). Connect all the vertices (corners) with lines, so every corner connects to every other corner. Then, color every single line either red or blue. Graham wanted to know: What is the minimum number of dimensions (n) required to guarantee that, no matter how you color the lines, there will always be 4 vertices that lie on a single flat plane where all 6 connecting lines are the exact same color? He couldn't find the exact answer, but he proved that the answer had to be less than or equal to this massive number (g64). Summary of Mind-Boggling Facts  * Your brain would collapse: If you tried to hold all the digits of Graham's number in your head at once, your brain would literally collapse into a black hole, because the amount of information (entropy) required would exceed the maximum energy density your skull can hold.  * The ending is known: While we cannot know the beginning digits, mathematicians have calculated the last few digits. The number ends in ...2464195387.  * The actual answer: Decades later, mathematicians proved the actual answer to Graham's hypercube problem is much smaller—likely as small as 11 or 13. But Graham's number remains famous as a monument to the staggering scale of mathematical infinity.
dont support!#creatorsearchinsights #tcc #edit #tccedit #rampage Graham’s number is an unimaginably massive upper bound used in a mathematical proof within a branch of combinatorics called Ramsey theory. For a long time, it held the Guinness World Record for the largest positive integer ever used in a serious mathematical proof. It is so large that the observable universe doesn't contain enough space to write down its digits, even if every digit occupied the smallest possible volume of space (a Planck volume). Here is a breakdown of how it’s built, why it exists, and just how big it really is. 1. The Math Behind It: Knuth's Up-Arrow Notation To understand Graham's number, standard exponentiation (x^y) isn't powerful enough. Mathematicians use Knuth’s up-arrow notation, which builds higher levels of arithmetic operations. * Single Arrow: Standard exponentiation. 3 up-arrow 3 = 3^3 = 27 * Double Arrow: A tower of exponents (tetration). 3 up-arrow up-arrow 3 = 3^(3^3) = 3^27 = 7,625,597,484,987 * Triple Arrow: A tower of towers. 3 up-arrow up-arrow up-arrow 3 means you create a tower of 3s that is over 7.6 trillion layers tall. 2. Building Graham's Number (G64) Graham's number is constructed in 64 sequential steps or layers. We start with a value called g1: g1 = 3 up-arrow up-arrow up-arrow up-arrow 3 Even g1 is already too large to grasp. It uses four up-arrows. Now, we use the result of the previous layer to determine the number of arrows in the next layer: * Layer 1 (g1): 3 up-arrow up-arrow up-arrow up-arrow 3 * Layer 2 (g2): 3 [g1 number of arrows] 3 * Layer 3 (g3): 3 [g2 number of arrows] 3 * ... * Layer 64 (g64): Graham's Number (a tower of 3s with g63 arrows between them) 3. Why Was It Created? In 1971, mathematician Ronald Graham was working on a problem in Ramsey theory, which looks for order in chaotic systems. Imagine an n-dimensional hypercube (a cube in higher dimensions). Connect all the vertices (corners) with lines, so every corner connects to every other corner. Then, color every single line either red or blue. Graham wanted to know: What is the minimum number of dimensions (n) required to guarantee that, no matter how you color the lines, there will always be 4 vertices that lie on a single flat plane where all 6 connecting lines are the exact same color? He couldn't find the exact answer, but he proved that the answer had to be less than or equal to this massive number (g64). Summary of Mind-Boggling Facts * Your brain would collapse: If you tried to hold all the digits of Graham's number in your head at once, your brain would literally collapse into a black hole, because the amount of information (entropy) required would exceed the maximum energy density your skull can hold. * The ending is known: While we cannot know the beginning digits, mathematicians have calculated the last few digits. The number ends in ...2464195387. * The actual answer: Decades later, mathematicians proved the actual answer to Graham's hypercube problem is much smaller—likely as small as 11 or 13. But Graham's number remains famous as a monument to the staggering scale of mathematical infinity.

About