1. Home
  2. Detail

@huongtran129: Mình thích mặc chân váy dáng dài như này lắm luôn✨#huongtranreview

𝙃𝙪𝙤𝙣𝙜 𝙏𝙧𝙖𝙣 🍒
𝙃𝙪𝙤𝙣𝙜 𝙏𝙧𝙖𝙣 🍒
Open In TikTok:
Region: VN
Tuesday 07 April 2026 04:24:49 GMT
19010
45
2
22

Music

Download

No Watermark .mp4 (1.75MB) No Watermark(HD) .mp4 (1.23MB) Watermark .mp4 (1.91MB) Music .mp3

Comments

user2455003825468
Kim_Kim :
e xin link áo sơ mi vs ạ
2026-05-14 18:40:12
0
thaodt.1209
Dương Thảo :
T xin if đôi giày b đi nhé
2026-04-15 23:33:06
0
To see more videos from user @huongtran129, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos
لماذا أصبحت البشر هكذا لماذا بقيت القلوب مثل الحجر... #الفيلسوف #فيديو #حكم #اقوال #حالات_واتس #اقتباسات_عبارات_خواطر #مصمم_فيديوهات #كلام_من_ذهب #كلام_يغير_مفهومك_عن_الحياة #لايك #كومنت #اكسبلور
لماذا أصبحت البشر هكذا لماذا بقيت القلوب مثل الحجر... #الفيلسوف #فيديو #حكم #اقوال #حالات_واتس #اقتباسات_عبارات_خواطر #مصمم_فيديوهات #كلام_من_ذهب #كلام_يغير_مفهومك_عن_الحياة #لايك #كومنت #اكسبلور
‌‌لَّا ‌‌إِلَٰهَ‌‌ ‌إِلَّا‌ ‌أَنتَ‌‌ ‌سُبْحَانَكَ‌‌ إِنِّي‌‌ كُنتُ‌‌ ‌مِنَ‌‌ ‌الظَّالِمِينَ‌‌ #foryou #foryoupage #fpy #fpyシ #islam @TikTok
‌‌لَّا ‌‌إِلَٰهَ‌‌ ‌إِلَّا‌ ‌أَنتَ‌‌ ‌سُبْحَانَكَ‌‌ إِنِّي‌‌ كُنتُ‌‌ ‌مِنَ‌‌ ‌الظَّالِمِينَ‌‌ #foryou #foryoupage #fpy #fpyシ #islam @TikTok
@deepstorycast @Bettina Rudolph @sourafamiranda Oferecimento @orizpartners #reflexao #motivação #deepstory #deepstoryclipfy #clipfyleague
@deepstorycast @Bettina Rudolph @sourafamiranda Oferecimento @orizpartners #reflexao #motivação #deepstory #deepstoryclipfy #clipfyleague
እነ አልባግዳዲ የማያመጡት የለም! እነ አልባግዳዲ ( የአይ ኤስ መሪ በኢትዮጵያ) የኢትዮጵያን ስም ጨምሮ መንገዱ፣ አደባባዩ፣ ሀውልቶቹ ሁሉ ስማቸው ይቀየር እያሉ እየጠየቁ ነው አሉ። እያንዳንድሽ ለስምሽም ተዘጋጅ! ደስ አይልህም እንጅ የኢትዮጵያን ስም ቱርክ ቱርክዬ ብላ እንደቀየረችው አቆላምጠህ መጥራት ትችል ነበር አቶ አልባግዳዲ። ንጉስ ነጋሽን ንጉስ አልነጃሽ እንዳሉት እነ አጤ ምኒልክና አጤ ቴዎድሮስን ጭምር
እነ አልባግዳዲ የማያመጡት የለም! እነ አልባግዳዲ ( የአይ ኤስ መሪ በኢትዮጵያ) የኢትዮጵያን ስም ጨምሮ መንገዱ፣ አደባባዩ፣ ሀውልቶቹ ሁሉ ስማቸው ይቀየር እያሉ እየጠየቁ ነው አሉ። እያንዳንድሽ ለስምሽም ተዘጋጅ! ደስ አይልህም እንጅ የኢትዮጵያን ስም ቱርክ ቱርክዬ ብላ እንደቀየረችው አቆላምጠህ መጥራት ትችል ነበር አቶ አልባግዳዲ። ንጉስ ነጋሽን ንጉስ አልነጃሽ እንዳሉት እነ አጤ ምኒልክና አጤ ቴዎድሮስን ጭምር "አል" እየጨመሩ ይጠሩልን ከማለት የሚመለሱ አይደሉም። ከመንገድ ቅርብ ርቀት ቤት ያላቸውን ዜጎች ጭምር ከስማቸው ላይ "አል" እየጨመሩ ይጠሩልን ባላሉ የአይ ኤስ የኢትዮጵያ ወኪል። የቱርክ አላማ አስፈፃሚነት እንዲህ ነው። ቱርክ ዓለም እየጮኸ ታሪካዊ ቤተ ክርስትያን መስጊድ አድርጋለች። ብዙ ስሞችንም ቀይራለች። እለ አልባግዳዲ ስም የመቀየር ስልትን ከኦሮሙማም ከቱርክም አዳቅለው ከምኒልክ ድኩላ እስከ ሚኒሊክ አደባባይ፣ ከእነ ጃንሆን እስከ ጃን ሜዳ..... ሲቀየር ነው እኛ እንደ ዜጋ የምንቆጠረው እያሉ ነው አሉ። በነገራችን ላይ አልባግዳዲ "አንድም ብዙም ነኝ"። ይላል በቃለ መጠይቆቹ። ዜጋ ነኝ። አማኝ ነኝ። ብሔር አለኝ። ወተዘ ይላል። በህዝብ ቆጠራም በርከት አድርጋችሁ ቁጠረኝ ነው የሚለው አልባግዳዲ በኢትዮጵያ። በነገራችን ላይ ቱርክ የማይቀይረው ነገር የለም። ብልፅግና በአስተሳሰባቸው ሳይሆን በሰውነታቸው እንዲለኩ የሚያደርጓቸው ሴቶች ጋር የሚውለው አልባግዳዲ የኢትዮጵያ ክፍልም ግማሹ ለሆነ አገር፣ ቀሪው አልሸባብ ለሚቆጣጠረው አካባቢ ወዘተ ተቆራርሶ "ሸንቀጥ ቀጥ ትበል" ሊሉ ይችላሉ። ከስሟ በተጨማሪ። ያው የሚወራለትን ምክክር ኮምሽን እነ አልባግዳዲ ናቸው እንዲህ እቃ እቃ ሲጫወቱበት የሚውሉት። (አልባግዳዲ የሚለውን ስም አንድ ብሎክ ያደረገኝ የኢዜማ ደጋፊ ፀሐፊ እንዳወጣው በስክሪን ሹት አይቸ ነው። በሌላው አስተሳሰቡ ባንስማማም ይህን የአልባግዳዲ ስያሜ ግን ወስጀዋለሁ።)#africa #newsዜና #ethiopian_news
Should you buy the crash? This chart uses the S&P 500 price index only going back to 1928 and measures the market’s average forward 12-month return after different drawdown levels. The setups: All Months: every month Down 5%: market is at least 5% below its prior peak Down 10%: market is at least 10% below its prior peak Down 20%: market is at least 20% below its prior peak Down 30%: market is at least 30% below its prior peak Down 40%: market is at least 40% below its prior peak The result: All Months: 8.15% Down 5%: 8.20% Down 10%: 8.31% Down 20%: 8.00% Down 30%: 7.44% Down 40%: 7.44% So yes, the differences look small at first glance. They are not meaningless. A move from 8.15% to 8.31% is not some earth-shattering miracle, but it does show that buying after a moderate correction historically gave you a slightly better average 1-year outcome than buying in a random month. And the drop from roughly 8.3% to 7.4% at deeper crash levels is not trivial either. That is nearly a 0.9 percentage point difference in expected 12-month price return. Over long holding periods, differences like that compound into real money. The most interesting part is this: The best average outcome here was not after the biggest crashes. It was after a 10% drawdown. So the simple “the more it crashes, the safer it gets” story is too lazy. Buying mild-to-moderate weakness historically looked a bit better than average. But once you get into deeper crashes, the market is usually there for a reason. Those environments are more dangerous, and the next 12 months have historically been less attractive than people assume. Also, this is price only, not total return. It excludes dividends. That matters for the absolute numbers. But the comparison between drawdown buckets is still useful because the test is being applied consistently across all conditions. So the clean takeaway is: Buying the dip helped a little. Buying a full-blown crash did not automatically create the best 1-year return. Data source: Yahoo Finance. Series: ^GSPC monthly price data. Returns shown are average forward 12-month price returns, not total returns. Follow for more charts like this. I built a full workflow for making charts like this from data to design to posting. Get the chart system through the link in my bio.
Should you buy the crash? This chart uses the S&P 500 price index only going back to 1928 and measures the market’s average forward 12-month return after different drawdown levels. The setups: All Months: every month Down 5%: market is at least 5% below its prior peak Down 10%: market is at least 10% below its prior peak Down 20%: market is at least 20% below its prior peak Down 30%: market is at least 30% below its prior peak Down 40%: market is at least 40% below its prior peak The result: All Months: 8.15% Down 5%: 8.20% Down 10%: 8.31% Down 20%: 8.00% Down 30%: 7.44% Down 40%: 7.44% So yes, the differences look small at first glance. They are not meaningless. A move from 8.15% to 8.31% is not some earth-shattering miracle, but it does show that buying after a moderate correction historically gave you a slightly better average 1-year outcome than buying in a random month. And the drop from roughly 8.3% to 7.4% at deeper crash levels is not trivial either. That is nearly a 0.9 percentage point difference in expected 12-month price return. Over long holding periods, differences like that compound into real money. The most interesting part is this: The best average outcome here was not after the biggest crashes. It was after a 10% drawdown. So the simple “the more it crashes, the safer it gets” story is too lazy. Buying mild-to-moderate weakness historically looked a bit better than average. But once you get into deeper crashes, the market is usually there for a reason. Those environments are more dangerous, and the next 12 months have historically been less attractive than people assume. Also, this is price only, not total return. It excludes dividends. That matters for the absolute numbers. But the comparison between drawdown buckets is still useful because the test is being applied consistently across all conditions. So the clean takeaway is: Buying the dip helped a little. Buying a full-blown crash did not automatically create the best 1-year return. Data source: Yahoo Finance. Series: ^GSPC monthly price data. Returns shown are average forward 12-month price returns, not total returns. Follow for more charts like this. I built a full workflow for making charts like this from data to design to posting. Get the chart system through the link in my bio.

About

Legal