@eddiedoesmath: The derivative of e^x = e^x | The function that equals itself Save if you found this useful! [Derivative Of e^x, Why Is e^x Its Own Derivative, Exponential Functions Explained, What Is e In Math, Calculus Basics SAT, SAT Math Concepts, Understanding Derivatives, Rate Of Change Explained, Exponential Growth Explained, Precalculus Concepts, AP Calculus AB Basics, AP Calculus BC Concepts, Math Help SAT Prep, Functions And Derivatives, e To The Power x Explained, Intro To Calculus, Math Concepts Made Simple, Learn Calculus Fast, Exponential Models In Real Life, SAT Math Tips, EddieDoesMath, MyEdSpace]

EddieDoesMath
EddieDoesMath
Open In TikTok:
Region: US
Friday 08 May 2026 03:33:13 GMT
129754
7816
103
651

Music

Download

Comments

faisalmf.1
فيصل 🇦🇪🇱🇧🇵🇸 :
using taylor series while finding the derivative of e^x is circular reasoning as you need the derivative of e^x to find the taylor series expansion of e^x
2026-05-24 18:02:41
5
mrsafi.m
Safi :
your proof is wrong since using taylor series presumes the derivative of e^x is e^x
2026-05-09 14:11:29
236
haardshah8
haard.climbs :
This is circular, the derivative is used to get the Taylor expansion of e^h. Therefore the only way to prove this is to use other methods to evaluate the limit. And no, you can’t use L’Hospital’s rule either.
2026-05-08 06:22:17
269
jonny21110
jonny21110 :
This is thé worst proof I’ve ever seen. You can’t do this.
2026-05-09 20:05:25
27
marxslop
marxslop :
d/dx[e^x] = xe^x-1 😅
2026-05-09 05:42:07
77
user1chr83747fhd2
---- :
this is completely circular since the Taylor series of f(x)=e^x is Σ[f'(x-a)/n!]*(x-a)^n. you literally can't derive the Taylor series of e^x without already knowing the derivative of e^c
2026-05-12 22:53:07
0
yo_pro124
Jonathan :
but that proof has nothing to do with 2.718....., you are just using e as a variabel
2026-05-26 16:43:14
3
estrosilv
vespero :
oh boy, circular demonstration.
2026-05-29 20:00:53
6
anouarpcr
Anouar :
Is it because: f’(x) = e^x * ln(e) = e^x
2026-05-09 11:52:45
13
wateriswet12
Bela :
I thought it was because, a number that approaches 0 divided by a number that approaches 0 is just 1, because any number divided by itself is 1.
2026-05-26 05:48:15
0
user06893471
Mejiarma :
As h reaches 0, limit = [ ( e^x - e^x ) / h ] = 0/h = 0
2026-05-10 15:03:16
0
wronksien
Le Wronskien :
😅and of course Taylor series come from derivatives so your proof it's quite circular
2026-05-09 16:50:50
7
poppi256
poppi256 :
If you use Taylor, then you could have aplied it at first hand. You dont need even the limit. just derive the Taylor series
2026-05-09 17:02:21
2
soldier_of_agartha
King_Chlamydia :
Crazy nice graph there with zero effort😭
2026-05-11 06:20:49
1
owaesatme
Owaes Atme :
you can use tylor to prove that cause you dont now tylor for e if you dont now the derivative
2026-05-18 09:38:04
1
romariohx7
romariohx :
That’s not a proof . The derivative of e^x is e^x cause we defined it that way , trying to find the derivative of a^x . 😉😉
2026-05-10 01:27:36
2
vldm5441
😴 :
The taylor series require the derivative of e^x. Also it is inappropriate to show that the series 1 + h + h^2/2! + … approach 1 wothout a proper proof, since it is the sum of infinite number of terms
2026-05-10 07:11:08
2
janayaappiah
Janaya ✝️ :
circular reasoning mate
2026-05-09 08:13:47
6
emmanueloppong471
emmanueloppong886 :
i love how you try to explain from basic concept.
2026-05-11 14:19:36
1
g0ld0nn
Gold3nn :
what is h for?
2026-05-10 19:27:02
1
poppi256
poppi256 :
just proof it by d/dx of the Euler or Bernoulli formula (idk whats the name) lim((1+x/n)^n) :
2026-05-18 16:39:43
1
joe_hunting
Joe.Hunting :
Wrong, It’s circular reasoning.
2026-05-10 08:32:24
1
roadsahead23
roadsahead23 :
I have no idea how Taylor series works imma just take ur word it makes sense 😂
2026-05-19 05:57:37
1
coran_arab_cours_enligne
Cours_En_Ligne_CORAN_ARABE :
thank so much 🥰
2026-05-09 15:57:07
1
To see more videos from user @eddiedoesmath, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos


About