1. Home
  2. Detail

@poshto.islamic.bayan: 5 Karen getting instant karma #karma #karen #karens #instantkarma

Karen Cam
Karen Cam
Open In TikTok:
Region: US
Thursday 14 May 2026 14:37:32 GMT
57
4
0
0

Music

Download

No Watermark .mp4 (5.08MB) No Watermark(HD) .mp4 (5.08MB) Watermark .mp4 (4.77MB) Music .mp3

Comments

There are no more comments for this video.
To see more videos from user @poshto.islamic.bayan, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

He left as a Soviet, returned as a Russian. #facts #physics #Science #humanity #viral
He left as a Soviet, returned as a Russian. #facts #physics #Science #humanity #viral
Science quiz:can you get 5/5;science quiz#sciencequiz#quizvideo#quiztime#tiktokquizvideo#sciencequizchallenge#seo#fyp#sciencequiz#quizgame#quizvideo
Science quiz:can you get 5/5;science quiz#sciencequiz#quizvideo#quiztime#tiktokquizvideo#sciencequizchallenge#seo#fyp#sciencequiz#quizgame#quizvideo
#velocity #velocityedit #fypシ゚
#velocity #velocityedit #fypシ゚
#potatohoicham #tamtrang #tinhyeu #viral
#potatohoicham #tamtrang #tinhyeu #viral
Volume Profile is useful. The problem is what people claim it tells you. POC, VAH and VAL are real statistics. They tell you where the most trading happened within a specific range. But they don’t tell you who traded there, why they traded there, or what they’re going to do next. That distinction matters. A POC could reflect hedging, liquidation, rebalancing, options flow, or directional trading. The number itself doesn’t tell you which one. So when someone shows one historical example where price reacts perfectly at the POC and then tells you that’s where institutions are buying… that’s where I’d slow down. You’re taking a statistic that describes what already happened and turning it into a prediction of what happens next. A professional desk can absolutely use Volume Profile as context or confluence. But it isn’t a decision engine. The question isn’t, “Did price react here?” Of course it did. You’re showing me the example where it worked. The real question is: “Did this give you a repeatable edge before you knew the outcome?” Because finding a level after the move is easy. Proving it actually had predictive value beforehand is the hard part. Volume tells you where trading happened. It doesn’t automatically tell you why it happened, who was behind it, or what happens next.
Volume Profile is useful. The problem is what people claim it tells you. POC, VAH and VAL are real statistics. They tell you where the most trading happened within a specific range. But they don’t tell you who traded there, why they traded there, or what they’re going to do next. That distinction matters. A POC could reflect hedging, liquidation, rebalancing, options flow, or directional trading. The number itself doesn’t tell you which one. So when someone shows one historical example where price reacts perfectly at the POC and then tells you that’s where institutions are buying… that’s where I’d slow down. You’re taking a statistic that describes what already happened and turning it into a prediction of what happens next. A professional desk can absolutely use Volume Profile as context or confluence. But it isn’t a decision engine. The question isn’t, “Did price react here?” Of course it did. You’re showing me the example where it worked. The real question is: “Did this give you a repeatable edge before you knew the outcome?” Because finding a level after the move is easy. Proving it actually had predictive value beforehand is the hard part. Volume tells you where trading happened. It doesn’t automatically tell you why it happened, who was behind it, or what happens next.
film ini ga pernah gagal kalo soal Nyindir pemerintah konoha #bapakpalingjujur #jadibapakjujur #clips #fyp #rekomendasifilm
film ini ga pernah gagal kalo soal Nyindir pemerintah konoha #bapakpalingjujur #jadibapakjujur #clips #fyp #rekomendasifilm

About

Legal