@sanatorium.tattoo: Just a morning of small tattoos in our shop ✍️ #tattooideas #minimaltattoo #tattooshop #tattooinspiration

Sanatorium Tattoo
Sanatorium Tattoo
Open In TikTok:
Region: GB
Friday 19 June 2026 10:59:38 GMT
1041
10
0
2

Music

Download

Comments

There are no more comments for this video.
To see more videos from user @sanatorium.tattoo, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

TRUMP BLOCKED CNN. THE PRESS STOOD TOGETHER. NOW THE DOJ IS INVESTIGATING. A confrontation over press freedom at the White House has escalated into a federal antitrust investigation involving five of America’s largest television news networks. Here’s what happened. SEPTEMBER 19, 2026 The Trump administration revoked White House access for CNN, MS NOW, and Politico. The three news organizations challenged the restrictions, arguing that the government was violating their First Amendment rights. THE NETWORKS RESPONDED ABC, CBS, CNN, NBC, and Fox News collectively suspended their participation in the White House television press pool. That includes Fox News. The press pool operates through a shared system in which networks take turns recording presidential events and distributing footage to other news organizations. Their coordinated suspension was a protest against the exclusion of fellow journalists. SEPTEMBER 24 A federal judge ruled that the White House restrictions were likely unconstitutional and ordered access restored. The networks subsequently resumed pool coverage. OCTOBER 9–10 The Department of Justice sent civil investigative demands to all five networks and confirmed an antitrust investigation. The DOJ argues that coordinated boycotts among competing businesses can violate the Sherman Antitrust Act. That is a genuine legal question, but an investigation does not establish that any network broke the law. Press-freedom advocates have raised a different concern: whether federal investigative powers are being used in a way that could discourage news organizations from collectively defending press access. CONSIDER THE SEQUENCE. The administration excludes journalists. Competing news organizations stand together in protest. A federal judge intervenes. Then the administration’s Justice Department investigates the networks that protested. The legal outcome remains undetermined. But the constitutional question is significant: When journalists collectively resist restrictions on press access, where does legitimate antitrust enforcement end and potential government retaliation begin? And what does it mean when even Fox News joins its competitors in solidarity? What do you think? 📚 SOURCES Reuters, October 10, 2026: https://www.reuters.com/business/media-telecom/justice-department-probes-tv-networks-over-trump-pool-coverage-new-york-times-2026-10-10/ Associated Press, October 10, 2026: https://apnews.com/article/687c09a2377e7033c0b452c893c46e12 NBC News, October 11, 2026: https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/national-international/justice-department-investigates-tv-networks-over-suspending-pool-coverage-of-trump/4166000/ #PressFreedom #Trump #DOJ #FirstAmendment #cnn
TRUMP BLOCKED CNN. THE PRESS STOOD TOGETHER. NOW THE DOJ IS INVESTIGATING. A confrontation over press freedom at the White House has escalated into a federal antitrust investigation involving five of America’s largest television news networks. Here’s what happened. SEPTEMBER 19, 2026 The Trump administration revoked White House access for CNN, MS NOW, and Politico. The three news organizations challenged the restrictions, arguing that the government was violating their First Amendment rights. THE NETWORKS RESPONDED ABC, CBS, CNN, NBC, and Fox News collectively suspended their participation in the White House television press pool. That includes Fox News. The press pool operates through a shared system in which networks take turns recording presidential events and distributing footage to other news organizations. Their coordinated suspension was a protest against the exclusion of fellow journalists. SEPTEMBER 24 A federal judge ruled that the White House restrictions were likely unconstitutional and ordered access restored. The networks subsequently resumed pool coverage. OCTOBER 9–10 The Department of Justice sent civil investigative demands to all five networks and confirmed an antitrust investigation. The DOJ argues that coordinated boycotts among competing businesses can violate the Sherman Antitrust Act. That is a genuine legal question, but an investigation does not establish that any network broke the law. Press-freedom advocates have raised a different concern: whether federal investigative powers are being used in a way that could discourage news organizations from collectively defending press access. CONSIDER THE SEQUENCE. The administration excludes journalists. Competing news organizations stand together in protest. A federal judge intervenes. Then the administration’s Justice Department investigates the networks that protested. The legal outcome remains undetermined. But the constitutional question is significant: When journalists collectively resist restrictions on press access, where does legitimate antitrust enforcement end and potential government retaliation begin? And what does it mean when even Fox News joins its competitors in solidarity? What do you think? 📚 SOURCES Reuters, October 10, 2026: https://www.reuters.com/business/media-telecom/justice-department-probes-tv-networks-over-trump-pool-coverage-new-york-times-2026-10-10/ Associated Press, October 10, 2026: https://apnews.com/article/687c09a2377e7033c0b452c893c46e12 NBC News, October 11, 2026: https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/national-international/justice-department-investigates-tv-networks-over-suspending-pool-coverage-of-trump/4166000/ #PressFreedom #Trump #DOJ #FirstAmendment #cnn

About