@vidyoohatmotanawi3a: #دعاء_يريح_القلوب #يارب_دعوتك_فأستجب_لي_دعائي #حفظكم_الله_ورعاكم_ونصركم_وأعزّكم_ #مساء_الخير

ياقوتة
ياقوتة
Open In TikTok:
Region: MA
Tuesday 23 June 2026 15:34:55 GMT
25599
1192
176
1564

Music

Download

Comments

adem.31113
Adem 31 :
يا رب ارح قلبي واجعلني من الحامدين و الشاكرين
2026-06-23 16:41:36
4
ahmedabaaziz
Ahmed Abaaziz :
Amén
2026-06-24 08:46:42
1
khairaa047
khaira :
🤲🤲🤲amine.ya.rab.elaalamine🙏
2026-06-24 03:59:55
0
dywjjn05bxkx
dywjjn05bxkx :
اللهم امين...اللهم صل وسلم على نبينا محمد
2026-06-23 21:19:48
1
choukimoha65
شوقي🇲🇦 :
امين 🤲
2026-06-23 18:25:10
1
khadijasini
Marrakech :
ameen🤲🤲🤲🤲🤲
2026-06-24 08:27:29
0
q.qa43
Q Qa :
@اميييين يارب
2026-06-24 08:42:29
0
amouna1937
user2274335037226 :
Amine
2026-06-24 08:16:04
0
user16320744681207
ام يوسف :
اللهم امين يارب اللهم امين يارب اللهم امين يارب اللهم
2026-06-23 16:34:52
2
bouchrabelasla
bouchrabelasla :
اللهم امين يارب العالمين
2026-06-24 07:43:23
0
djina.ngaide
djinangaide :
Allahoume Amine Ya Rabb
2026-06-24 08:27:59
0
nadiaynhimu
Sofia 🇲🇦🌹🇲🇦 :
Amine 🤲🏼🤲🏼
2026-06-24 07:24:10
0
abdulaziz.al.shah
Abdulaziz Al Shahrani :
اللهم امييين 🙏
2026-06-24 07:37:29
0
jouharakarzazi
Jouhara :
اللهم امين يارب العالمين 🤲🤲
2026-06-23 15:40:31
1
ba_7312
ام فهد❤️ :
اللهم اميين يارب العالمين
2026-06-24 07:49:07
0
user9983915830245
محمد خضر :
اللهم آمين يارب العالمين بآرك الله فيك اخي وجزاك الله خيراً
2026-06-24 08:21:12
0
nora.hadjadj2
Nora Hadjadj :
amin 🤲🤲🤲🤲🤲🤲🤲🤲❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
2026-06-24 07:44:08
0
zineb_2paris
Anna :
Amin Amin Amin Amin Amin Amin Amin Amin Amin Amin Amin Amin Amin Amin 🤲🤲🤲🤲🤲🤲🤲🤲🤲🤲. Yarabi Amin Amin Amin Amin Amin
2026-06-24 08:09:37
0
ummohammed.f
أم محمد :
اللهم امين يارب العالمين
2026-06-24 06:57:19
0
user4516391906115
user4516391906115 :
امين امين امين امين امين امين امين امين امين امين امين يارب امين يارب امين يارب يارب يارب يارب يارب يارب يارب يارب يارب
2026-06-24 06:48:49
0
user132813902053
ام فادي عاليه :
اللهم امين يارب العالمين اللهم امين يارب العالمين اللهم امين يارب العالمين اللهم امين يارب العالمين اللهم امين يارب العالمين اللهم امين يارب العالمين فرجك ورحمتك يارب العالمين
2026-06-24 05:05:52
1
yassine.yassouna1
so3ad :
الهما امين
2026-06-24 07:20:14
0
yhklefmamba
Carlo :
Amine ya rabi al 3alamine
2026-06-24 07:11:59
0
user24309598500185
ميرنا البيشي :
: اللهم امين يارب العالمين انا واولادي وامة محمد اجمعين ياارحم الراحمين والحمدلله على كل حال دائما وابدا واستغفر الله العظيم من كل ذنب عظيم واتوب اليه عدد خلقه ورضا نفسه وزنة عرشه ومداد
2026-06-24 07:00:32
0
65hrby
قدافي عبدالسلام أحميد :
أمين يارب العالمين ☝️🤲
2026-06-23 15:37:32
0
To see more videos from user @vidyoohatmotanawi3a, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

Graham's number is an immense number that arose as an upper bound on the answer of a problem in the mathematical field of Ramsey theory. It is much larger than many other large numbers such as Skewes's number and Moser's number, both of which are in turn much, much larger than a googolplex. As with these, it is so large that the observable universe is far too small to contain an ordinary digital representation of Graham's number, assuming that each digit occupies one Planck volume. But even the number of digits in this digital representation of Graham's number would itself be a number so large that its digital representation cannot be represented in the observable universe. Nor even can the number of digits of that number—and so forth, for a number of times far exceeding the total number of Planck volumes in the observable universe. Thus, Graham's number cannot be expressed even by physical universe-scale power towers of the form  a b c ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ {\displaystyle a^{b^{c^{\cdot ^{\cdot ^{\cdot }}}}}}, even though Graham's number is indeed a power of three. However, Graham's number can be explicitly given by computable recursive formulas using Knuth's up-arrow notation or equivalent, as was done by Ronald Graham, the number's namesake. As there is a recursive formula to define it, it is much smaller than typical busy beaver numbers, the sequence of which grows faster than any computable sequence. Though too large to ever be computed in full, the sequence of digits of Graham's number can be computed explicitly via simple algorithms; the last 10 digits of Graham's number are ...2464195387. Using Knuth's up-arrow notation, Graham's number is  g 64 {\displaystyle g_{64}},[1] where g n = { 3↑↑↑↑3,	 if  n=1  and 3 ↑ g n − 1 3,	 if  n≥2.  {\displaystyle g_{n}={\begin{cases}3\uparrow \uparrow \uparrow \uparrow 3,&{\text{if }}n=1{\text{ and}}\\3\uparrow ^{g_{n-1}}3,&{\text{if }}n\geq 2.\end{cases}}} Graham's number was used by Graham in conversations with popular science writer Martin Gardner as a simplified explanation of the upper bounds of the problem he was working on. In 1977, Gardner described the number in Scientific American, introducing it to the general public. At the time of its introduction, it was the largest specific positive integer ever to have been used in a published mathematical proof. The number was described in the 1980 Guinness Book of World Records, adding to its popular interest. Other specific integers (such as TREE(3)) known to be far larger than Graham's number have since appeared in many serious mathematical proofs, for example in connection with Harvey Friedman's various finite forms of Kruskal's theorem. Additionally, smaller upper bounds on the Ramsey theory problem from which Graham's number was derived have since been proven to be valid. #AH #россия #anticommunist #anticommunistaction
Graham's number is an immense number that arose as an upper bound on the answer of a problem in the mathematical field of Ramsey theory. It is much larger than many other large numbers such as Skewes's number and Moser's number, both of which are in turn much, much larger than a googolplex. As with these, it is so large that the observable universe is far too small to contain an ordinary digital representation of Graham's number, assuming that each digit occupies one Planck volume. But even the number of digits in this digital representation of Graham's number would itself be a number so large that its digital representation cannot be represented in the observable universe. Nor even can the number of digits of that number—and so forth, for a number of times far exceeding the total number of Planck volumes in the observable universe. Thus, Graham's number cannot be expressed even by physical universe-scale power towers of the form a b c ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ {\displaystyle a^{b^{c^{\cdot ^{\cdot ^{\cdot }}}}}}, even though Graham's number is indeed a power of three. However, Graham's number can be explicitly given by computable recursive formulas using Knuth's up-arrow notation or equivalent, as was done by Ronald Graham, the number's namesake. As there is a recursive formula to define it, it is much smaller than typical busy beaver numbers, the sequence of which grows faster than any computable sequence. Though too large to ever be computed in full, the sequence of digits of Graham's number can be computed explicitly via simple algorithms; the last 10 digits of Graham's number are ...2464195387. Using Knuth's up-arrow notation, Graham's number is g 64 {\displaystyle g_{64}},[1] where g n = { 3↑↑↑↑3, if n=1 and 3 ↑ g n − 1 3, if n≥2. {\displaystyle g_{n}={\begin{cases}3\uparrow \uparrow \uparrow \uparrow 3,&{\text{if }}n=1{\text{ and}}\\3\uparrow ^{g_{n-1}}3,&{\text{if }}n\geq 2.\end{cases}}} Graham's number was used by Graham in conversations with popular science writer Martin Gardner as a simplified explanation of the upper bounds of the problem he was working on. In 1977, Gardner described the number in Scientific American, introducing it to the general public. At the time of its introduction, it was the largest specific positive integer ever to have been used in a published mathematical proof. The number was described in the 1980 Guinness Book of World Records, adding to its popular interest. Other specific integers (such as TREE(3)) known to be far larger than Graham's number have since appeared in many serious mathematical proofs, for example in connection with Harvey Friedman's various finite forms of Kruskal's theorem. Additionally, smaller upper bounds on the Ramsey theory problem from which Graham's number was derived have since been proven to be valid. #AH #россия #anticommunist #anticommunistaction

About