@jmjjitiyjohn1930: How St. Bernadette tested her vision to see if it was demonic ๐˜•๐˜ฐ๐˜ต ๐˜ฌ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฐ๐˜ธ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ ๐˜ข๐˜ต ๐˜ง๐˜ช๐˜ณ๐˜ด๐˜ต ๐˜ธ๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜“๐˜ข๐˜ฅ๐˜บ ๐˜ฅ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ด๐˜ด๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ ๐˜ธ๐˜ฉ๐˜ช๐˜ต๐˜ฆ ๐˜ธ๐˜ข๐˜ด ๐˜จ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฅ, ๐˜š๐˜ต. ๐˜‰๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ฏ๐˜ข๐˜ฅ๐˜ฆ๐˜ต๐˜ต๐˜ฆ ๐˜ข๐˜ฑ๐˜ฑ๐˜ณ๐˜ฐ๐˜ข๐˜ค๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ ๐˜ท๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ค๐˜ข๐˜ถ๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ๐˜ด๐˜ญ๐˜บ, ๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ท๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ ๐˜ข ๐˜ท๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ฆ๐˜ต๐˜บ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ง ๐˜ธ๐˜ข๐˜บ๐˜ด. Interestingly enough, St. Bernadette did not know she was seeing the Blessed Virgin Mary when the apparitions began. All she knew was that she saw a beautiful young lady dressed in white, with a blue sash around her waist. St. Bernadette's parents and siblings were even more skeptical, thinking that the lady was a soul from purgatory, or possibly a demon. The next time they visited the grotto, St. Bernadette and her siblings were prepared to test the vision. Holy water One of the first tests St. Bernadette performed was sprinkling the vision with holy water. The 1872 book Our Lady of Lourdes recounts this first test, which happened the next time St. Bernadette saw Our Lady: The little girls only perceived the desert rock and the branches of sweet briar which descended...where Bernadette contemplated an unknown being. Nevertheless, the countenance of Bernadette was such that there were no means of doubting. One of the children placed the bottle of holy water in the hands of her who saw. St. Bernadette then approached the vision and armed herself with the holy water: Then Bernadette remembering what she had promised, arose and shaking, quickly and with several repetitions, the little bottle sprinkled the wonderful lady, who quite graciously remained at some paces before her in the interior of the niche. St. Bernadette then said, "If you come on the part of God, approach." Our Lady "bowed several times and advanced almost to the end of the rock. She seemed to smile at the precautions of Bernadette and at her weapons of war and at the sacred name of God her countenance lighted up." Still slightly afraid, St. Bernadette proclaimed, "If you come on the part of the devil, begone." Our Lady did not leave until St. Bernadette finished praying her Rosary. Eventually St. Bernadette would ask the Lady what her name was, and she answered, "I am the Immaculate Conception." This was the final confirmation for St. Bernadette that the Lady she saw was not a demon, but the Blessed Virgin Mary.

BonaJMJJiTiY
BonaJMJJiTiY
Open In TikTok:
Region: MY
Friday 14 August 2026 01:47:32 GMT
9537
581
0
26

Music

Download

Comments

There are no more comments for this video.
To see more videos from user @jmjjitiyjohn1930, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

Moral relativism is the idea that right and wrong depend upon who I am and where I live. So if one culture says it is okay for a man to have lots of wives, that is fine. It is just our culture does things differently.  But according to the philosopher James Rachels, this will almost always involve a self-contradiction.  Moral relativism involves two claims. The first says that moral values depend upon culture. So, my upbringing and my childhood and my society will tell me what is right or wrong.  And so, second, we have no right to tell other people how they ought to behave. If one culture thinks it is okay to have child labour, then that is up to them. We do not do it, but we do a lot of things differently. Rachels argues that the moment you push back upon this, it falls apart, because is it okay, then, to stone an adulterer to a slow, painful, and humiliating death? Is it okay to torture an innocent person for the joy and pleasure of a coliseum full of cheering people?  The moral relativist has to say that those things are wrong according to me, but on what grounds can they then say we should stop what they are doing? We should tell them to change their values. One way out seems to be a kind of moral imperialism, and this is where we say that ethics is relative, but we will still impose our values upon you anyway, in a kind of might equals right. But most moral relativists do not like this idea.  So are ethics relative, or is there some absolute moral code? And if so, where does it come from? How do we know it, and should we impose that code on other people who are not obeying it?
Moral relativism is the idea that right and wrong depend upon who I am and where I live. So if one culture says it is okay for a man to have lots of wives, that is fine. It is just our culture does things differently. But according to the philosopher James Rachels, this will almost always involve a self-contradiction. Moral relativism involves two claims. The first says that moral values depend upon culture. So, my upbringing and my childhood and my society will tell me what is right or wrong. And so, second, we have no right to tell other people how they ought to behave. If one culture thinks it is okay to have child labour, then that is up to them. We do not do it, but we do a lot of things differently. Rachels argues that the moment you push back upon this, it falls apart, because is it okay, then, to stone an adulterer to a slow, painful, and humiliating death? Is it okay to torture an innocent person for the joy and pleasure of a coliseum full of cheering people? The moral relativist has to say that those things are wrong according to me, but on what grounds can they then say we should stop what they are doing? We should tell them to change their values. One way out seems to be a kind of moral imperialism, and this is where we say that ethics is relative, but we will still impose our values upon you anyway, in a kind of might equals right. But most moral relativists do not like this idea. So are ethics relative, or is there some absolute moral code? And if so, where does it come from? How do we know it, and should we impose that code on other people who are not obeying it?

About