@amy_santoro: Technically, yes, not guilty was an option. It always is realistically, it was not a viable option and it never was. #lindsayclancy #truecrime #law #crime #massachusetts

Amy Santoro, Ph.D.
Amy Santoro, Ph.D.
Open In TikTok:
Region: US
Wednesday 09 September 2026 22:19:34 GMT
103830
6876
681
142

Music

Download

Comments

jeno984
Jen O. :
I feel like I’m one of few people who feel she was guilty of murder one. Not saying she wasn’t depressed or even PP but she planned it.
2026-09-09 22:24:59
583
not_t_bear_oh
Teddy_bear_oh :
That’s actually not what you have been saying all along. Also, for everyone else - Amy is going to be on plaintiff and cops side. Her reporting has become bias and more of “I told you so” then about the law. I won’t get into all the women who falsely confess or how a lot of forensic science is considered bunk. Ultimately, We don’t know what this case would’ve been like if they were granted a bifurcated trial (remember when you said it was that) so he could separately argue not guilty. He had his hand tied behind his back and had to argue enough to just in case and most likely get her not criminally liable. Which no matter what is best option because she will need so much help. However! For y’all who may one day end up on a jury - the prosecutors have to prove beyond doubt not just the murder but how it went down. If the investigation was faulty, if the argument has holes, if the timeline moves, the experts get tripped up or contradict each other, those are all little nuggets that can add up to not guilty. It is on the prosecution to prove their case. Just because the jury in this video didn’t understand doesn’t mean you have to. Might I recommend Reb, a criminal law attorney, and her breakdown. Since she is a lawyer :)
2026-09-09 23:20:31
36
am_vs_pm
🌞AMvsPM🌛 🇨🇦 :
people forget that the jurors had more information than the public did
2026-09-09 22:28:05
857
matthew_wade_27
Matthew Wade :
They disregarded evidence in favor of feelings and bullied the jury room into compliance
2026-09-09 22:27:57
142
holamilambo
spicypotato :
These jurors were thinking emotionally and not logically. Thank god for the juror with a backbone. Her loving her children has nothing to do with whether she committed a murder suicide while not in psychosis.
2026-09-10 02:58:51
63
carebearstare0997
Erin :
people "snap" all the time! they still know right from wrong. when a man "snaps" out of nowhere and starts beating his wife after being a "loving husband" for years, he is held accountable!
2026-09-09 22:25:36
290
randompersonnn2
user69 :
why TF are these jurors immediately doing a press tour.
2026-09-10 05:29:53
17
desithwan
Desi ✨ :
But did these jurors watch the trial or see the bratz doll theory??? did they ask chatgpt about body temperature??
2026-09-10 09:53:47
7
lots.of.loops
Lots of Loops :
I’ve seen so many people saying that these jurors misunderstood their task coz they didn’t know they could fibd her not guilty 🤦🏻‍♀️they can’t understand that the instruction from the judge is a generic instruction given to all trials but it doesn’t take into consideration anything that happens in the trial
2026-09-11 14:45:07
2
cattyjimjam
Ali Cat :
“We’re trying to figure out if she knew right from wrong at the time”… “so we decided because she’s a good mom and loved her kids she must have snapped”… Not based on evidence, just vibes and feelings like the rest of the Lindsay supporters..
2026-09-10 00:51:57
32
pugboii3
AxO=0 RN 🇵🇸 :
There’s just no way you can have like 8 people testify on their interviews with Lindsay describing in great detail the day she killed her kids and then have her own lawyer say she did it like 40 times and rationally think not guilty was on the table
2026-09-09 22:26:17
386
scourgexashfurxhawkfrost
Aveline :
I just don’t get this argument from her. Couldn’t a man also use this argument? Couldn’t a man say something like, “Oooh look, I bought my wife so many expensive rings and expensive shoes, and look I took her on vacations, also I cooked for her and treated her well. I loved her! Yes I brutally beat her to death but it was just in a fit of rage, I didn’t understand what I was doing at the time!”
2026-09-09 23:36:09
46
banned24705
banned247 :
those women proved they were bias from the start. They were never gonna say guilty and nothing would change their mind
2026-09-10 03:15:28
18
luciferms_photography
luciferms :
i mostly agree with you, but im still curious y u would partially biased, at least I got that impression, you had no problem addressing juror who didn't vote for NGRI, yet u said nothing about 3 other jurors who used their background to explain toxicology report, to convince him which is Also misconduct and problematic, which is by definition bias, if u ignore other jurors and focus on 1 that didn't wanna give verdict u Like, don't get me wrong I def can see y would they all agree with NGRI, but other jurors using their personal background to convince someone is equally problematic
2026-09-09 22:31:43
22
baz_jay
Jay_Bas :
I am so sad that so many Lindsay supporters (of which I am one) don't seem to be grasping that the PPD and mistreatment by the system were the causes. If they finally realise that Patrick was also a victim (imperfect but still a tragic victim) will they turn on Lindsay?
2026-09-09 23:00:27
31
ashbeezy2010
ashbeezy2010 :
Please. Just give it a break.
2026-09-09 23:42:26
20
reardonwd
reardonwd :
Unfortunately the jurors saying “she loved her kids so she must’ve snapped” rather than breaking down what scientific testimony led them to their conclusion isn’t going to beat the “she got lucky she had a bunch of emotional women on her jury” allegations.
2026-09-09 23:51:08
46
ryj0resells
RYJ0 Resells :
"Everything proved she loved her children" does NOT mean she didnt know right from wrong....................
2026-09-10 12:09:45
14
jim156844
Jim :
those jurors proved they were biased from the beginning and only wanted to find Clancy not guilty.
2026-09-10 06:39:09
6
jessicarabbitesq
JessQuire :
Legally - it was an option. Practically - no, it was not going to be an option.
2026-09-10 02:10:38
37
against_the_law_reporter
Crime Reporter :
Everything you have said has proven true throughout this
2026-09-09 22:38:39
34
luckyladybug1111
Lori :
The number of people who thought the 11 were going for full acquittal and the one hold out was the not guilty by reason of insanity is wild.
2026-09-09 23:41:03
14
meandmyllama3
meandmyllama3 :
“She loved her children” is not reasonable indication of insanity.
2026-09-10 07:59:26
11
larrydacactuslol
LarryDaCactus :
why are people saying Patrick did it there is no evidence from what I've seen
2026-09-09 22:26:25
94
101hello1984
user9290889752617 :
That’s like saying a husband can’t kill a wife because he loves her. 🙄
2026-09-10 00:17:39
26
To see more videos from user @amy_santoro, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos


About