@pupu45491: Ngọc Điệm Thu tập 40thuyết minh #Ngocdiemthu #thualoi_tunhuocham #xuhuongtiktok

Pupu
Pupu
Open In TikTok:
Region: VN
Monday 02 November 2026 01:57:05 GMT
6564
223
43
10

Music

Download

Comments

01phuongan
Yên :
Má ơi, cái kết lãng xẹt. Bk dị khỏi coi. Không coi ngay lúc đâu rồi. Má ơi. Bà nào viết phim dị, bà nàooooooo
2026-11-02 07:15:30
1
ngoc.huyen321
Thiên ân nd :
không thể kết thúc như vậy được
2026-11-02 04:05:19
0
my_tien100797
Mytiennn :
Huhu. Khóc muốn chết lun v đó trơi. Coi xong phim ma day dứt. Khó chịu qua nay huhu
2026-11-02 08:56:35
0
kieuoanhhh84
AD :
Cái kết tào lao dễ sợ biết vậy không coi
2026-11-02 08:27:20
0
chuot74.quangtri
chuot74.quangtri :
Tôi muốn tìm ông đạo diễn gấp
2026-11-02 08:22:14
0
loanbinh4
Loanbinh :
Giữa cảnh loạn lạc mà tóc a 5 vẫn xếp nếp
2026-11-02 08:15:35
0
tran.diep1209
Tran Diep1209 :
Nên có một cái kết mở để có hy vọng thì hay hơn
2026-11-02 07:52:59
0
m.rum.x
❤️ LY ❤️ :
Xem tập cuối mà lòng đau như cắt nước mắt đầm đìa😢😢😢
2026-11-02 03:37:37
0
miushopgiaytui
MiushopTH :
vừa xem vừa khóc
2026-11-02 06:54:01
0
thanhvanreview9
thanhvanreview9 :
tức quá cái kết dở quá 🥺🥺
2026-11-02 07:24:09
0
anh_minh5
Phung Ruby765 :
Não lòng bây ôi vc đang hp vv thế mà lại âm dương cách biệt thương quá kết nv t k cam lòng🥺🥺🥺
2026-11-02 07:53:09
0
phanvui85
Tương tác với tôi :
Kết kỳ vậy , tui còn chưa kịp hình dung mỗi nhân vật ntn mà😳😳, hay do tui chậm hiểu nhỉ!
2026-11-02 07:57:29
0
lin.emon0501
Hòa & Dương 3 :
Kết phim chối vch
2026-11-02 07:50:11
0
huong.tran4870
Huong Tran :
biết thế k xem r, tưởng kết mất 1 chân về gặp nhau chứ.
2026-11-02 07:01:05
0
oanhkieuu97
Oanh Kiều :
Kết phim hụt hẫn gê😌
2026-11-02 07:16:00
0
nh56789109
mãi keo op💋❤ :
kết buồn
2026-11-02 08:01:54
0
ngocbe2022
Ngọc Bé🐯 :
2026-11-02 07:42:06
0
tran.diep1209
Tran Diep1209 :
Kết bi đát thế
2026-11-02 07:52:05
0
hanh.d.5351
Maphia oaxa :
t khóc lụt nhà bay ơi
2026-11-02 06:50:25
0
ngangnhucua590
Ny :
T khóc mắt sưng luôn
2026-11-02 06:43:24
0
giu.i.tn.sau06
giàu đổi tên sau :
Ô đạo diễn tàn nhẫn quá, cậu 5 bị tật cũng đc nhưng sống là đc mà sao phải nghẹo mới đc vậy
2026-11-02 08:56:44
0
dy8f3tt3areo
pi ❤️Ngọc :
Het pim lãng nhách
2026-11-02 06:53:59
0
yn.chi.n6
Cô hai :
Kết buon k vui
2026-11-02 08:53:58
0
thuongvo126
thuongvo1993 :
Kết k có hậu
2026-11-02 06:48:28
0
huyn.nguyn308
Huyền Nguyễn :
Khóc
2026-11-02 04:51:30
0
To see more videos from user @pupu45491, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

Liverpool vs Arsenal: Gakpo Penalty Appeal Denied 😡 [Liverpool vs Arsenal produced a major penalty debate at Anfield on 1 November 2026, when Cody Gakpo went down inside the Arsenal penalty area after contact with Christos Tzolis in the 29th minute. Liverpool wanted a spot-kick, but referee Andy Madley allowed play to continue and VAR checked the incident without overturning the decision. My view is that Tzolis held Gakpo and restricted his movement as he chased the loose ball. Under IFAB Law 12, holding an opponent is a direct-free-kick offence when the contact impedes movement. When that offence happens inside the defender’s penalty area, it can mean a penalty. The key point is whether Tzolis’s grip actually stopped Gakpo’s run, especially with another defender already in front of the ball. Former Premier League referee Mark Halsey later said the Tzolis contact was not enough for a penalty, while judging the earlier Jurrien Timber shirt pull on Alexander Isak as a clear penalty. Those are two separate incidents and should not be confused. This video explains why I believe Liverpool should have received a penalty for the Gakpo incident, what the rule says, and why the VAR decision remains debatable. Arsenal eventually won 1-0 through Kai Havertz’s 16th-minute goal.] Cody Gakpo, Christos Tzolis, Liverpool FC, Arsenal FC, Liverpool vs Arsenal, Liverpool Arsenal 2026, Premier League 2026 27, Premier League Matchday 9, Gakpo penalty appeal, Tzolis holding Gakpo, Liverpool denied penalty, Liverpool penalty controversy, Andy Madley referee, VAR penalty decision, Law 12 holding offence, football refereeing, Andoni Iraola, Alexander Isak penalty appeal, Jurrien Timber shirt pull, Arsenal 1-0 Liverpool #CodyGakpo #LiverpoolFC #ArsenalFC #PremierLeague  Was Tzolis's Contact Enough to Deny Gakpo a Penalty? Gakpo's Penalty Appeal and the Law Behind It Why Liverpool Were Left Furious With VAR Andoni Iraola Shows Officials the Gakpo Holding Incident Mark Halsey's Verdict on the Tzolis-Gakpo Contact Did Tzolis Stop Gakpo From Reaching the Ball? Liverpool's Two Penalty Claims Against Arsenal Explained The Moment Gakpo Went Down Inside Arsenal's Box Should Andy Madley Have Pointed to the Spot? What VAR Checked in Liverpool's Gakpo Penalty Appeal#creatorsearchinsights
Liverpool vs Arsenal: Gakpo Penalty Appeal Denied 😡 [Liverpool vs Arsenal produced a major penalty debate at Anfield on 1 November 2026, when Cody Gakpo went down inside the Arsenal penalty area after contact with Christos Tzolis in the 29th minute. Liverpool wanted a spot-kick, but referee Andy Madley allowed play to continue and VAR checked the incident without overturning the decision. My view is that Tzolis held Gakpo and restricted his movement as he chased the loose ball. Under IFAB Law 12, holding an opponent is a direct-free-kick offence when the contact impedes movement. When that offence happens inside the defender’s penalty area, it can mean a penalty. The key point is whether Tzolis’s grip actually stopped Gakpo’s run, especially with another defender already in front of the ball. Former Premier League referee Mark Halsey later said the Tzolis contact was not enough for a penalty, while judging the earlier Jurrien Timber shirt pull on Alexander Isak as a clear penalty. Those are two separate incidents and should not be confused. This video explains why I believe Liverpool should have received a penalty for the Gakpo incident, what the rule says, and why the VAR decision remains debatable. Arsenal eventually won 1-0 through Kai Havertz’s 16th-minute goal.] Cody Gakpo, Christos Tzolis, Liverpool FC, Arsenal FC, Liverpool vs Arsenal, Liverpool Arsenal 2026, Premier League 2026 27, Premier League Matchday 9, Gakpo penalty appeal, Tzolis holding Gakpo, Liverpool denied penalty, Liverpool penalty controversy, Andy Madley referee, VAR penalty decision, Law 12 holding offence, football refereeing, Andoni Iraola, Alexander Isak penalty appeal, Jurrien Timber shirt pull, Arsenal 1-0 Liverpool #CodyGakpo #LiverpoolFC #ArsenalFC #PremierLeague Was Tzolis's Contact Enough to Deny Gakpo a Penalty? Gakpo's Penalty Appeal and the Law Behind It Why Liverpool Were Left Furious With VAR Andoni Iraola Shows Officials the Gakpo Holding Incident Mark Halsey's Verdict on the Tzolis-Gakpo Contact Did Tzolis Stop Gakpo From Reaching the Ball? Liverpool's Two Penalty Claims Against Arsenal Explained The Moment Gakpo Went Down Inside Arsenal's Box Should Andy Madley Have Pointed to the Spot? What VAR Checked in Liverpool's Gakpo Penalty Appeal#creatorsearchinsights

About