CreationMinistriesInt.
Region: AU
Saturday 07 November 2026 21:30:48 GMT
1009
28
10
2
Music
Download
Comments
That Critically Think Atheist :
Fossil footprints act as trace fossils that record a single moment of an animal's life, such as walking, running, or feeding, and scientists use them to support an old earth model (billions of years old) through specific geological and stratigraphic patterns, while young-earth creationists interpret the same tracks differently. How Fossil Footprints Support an Old Earth • Gradual Sedimentary Layering: Footprints are left on soft mud, sand, or volcanic ash (like tuff), quickly covered by subsequent wind-blown sand or water-borne sediment, and cemented into rock over deep time. • Temporal and Stratigraphic Gaps: In standard paleontology, trace fossils (footprints) sometimes appear in rock layers millions of years before or alongside body fossils of the same lineage groups, reflecting the rare conditions required for both bones and tracks to fossilize independently. • Radiometric and Stratigraphic Dating: The rock strata containing these tracks are dated using surrounding volcanic ash, radioisotopes, and the geologic timescale, placing them tens to hundreds of millions of years in the past (e.g., Early Jurassic tracks from 183 million years ago). • Ecosystem Continuity: Trackways often show complex behaviors, multiple generations, weather patterns (like raindrop impressions and mudcracks), and recovery periods between volcanic or environmental events, which fit a slow, multi-million-year timeline.
2026-11-08 01:19:19
0
creep1ngtheycast :
That’s a bit of a leap, don’t you think? Fossil footprints are dried buried relatively quickly = all geologic layers were buried quickly and are young. It’s like Southpark underpants gnomes. “Step 1, we get the underpants. Step 3, we make money.” “What’s step 2?” “We don’t know.” Besides, geologic layers are confirmed to be vastly different ages, along with the very nature of fossilisation being that it takes a long time. You’re really cherrypicking fossilisation here.
2026-11-07 21:43:11
0
Xpyriant :
It's like arguing that because concrete can set in a day, every concrete footpath must be less than a week old, come on guys 😂
2026-11-07 22:54:39
1
Raffa 先生 :
Tell this guy not to wait for the Nobel Prize!!!…..
2026-11-08 01:47:48
0
Oscar100421 :
So let's go through it. 1) Soft sediment. Yep, we agree. 2) It hardens. Yep, agree. 3) It is covered. Yep still agree. 4) Suddenly this means young Earth? No logic or explanation, just "this means young". What? The irony of a creationist having the biggest missing link. Steps 1-3 all can and do exist in the evolutionary "old-Earth" model. It is rare, which is why there are so few compared to millions of years of evolution but NOTHING about those 3 steps indicate the Earth must be young, nothing WHATSOEVER. It's a classic creationist thing to present actual facts and then just say "so that backs us up" with no further explanation when it simply doesn't.
2026-11-07 22:33:50
0
What's Over There :
So close!
2026-11-07 23:10:12
0
CreationMinistriesInt. :
For more info, see the full interview with Dr Tas Walker, (link in profile): → ‘Do These Fossils Prove the Earth is Young?’ – youtu.be/qMcAA60EhkA
2026-11-07 21:31:57
0
Teo jew nang :
if there were no bible, what would you say?
2026-11-08 07:02:01
0
old man :
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
2026-11-08 04:20:38
0
To see more videos from user @creationministries, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
